Mexico -- Commerce; Mexico -- Economic conditions; Mexico -- Politics and government -- 1910-1946
American $655,000,000
British 670,000,000
French 285,000,000
German 75,000,000
Spanish, Dutch, etc. 190,000,000
-------------
Total $1,875,000,000
These figures claim to include the foreign investment in the National
Debt of Mexico and are said to estimate the actual distribution,
as far as can be worked out, of the holdings of the securities of
all companies operating in Mexico. Consul Letcher’s figures were
conceivably based largely on the nationality of the corporations alone.
On the other hand, Europe contributed more than half the invested
capital of such important groups as the National Railways of Mexico,
made up of companies which were all incorporated under American laws.
When this new compilation of investment distribution first came to
my hands, I was, I may admit, inclined to “split the difference.” As
careful a study of the American investment field as it is possible to
make has, however, convinced me that the new figures are much more
nearly correct than those of Consul Letcher with one exception. I
do not believe that they include all the American investment in the
Mexican government, state and municipal bonds held abroad.
On the other hand, neither Consul Letcher’s figures nor the other
compilation represent the actual full value of American investments in
Mexico at the fall of Diaz in 1911. It is important that this fact be
remembered because by that date the moneys which had gone into Mexico
for foreign enterprise had increased many fold through the energy
which went with them and pushed them forward to success. I believe
that the original American investment had grown, by 1911, to fully
$2,000,000,000, but in order to be absolutely just from the Mexican
viewpoint we can discuss the damages on the basis of the actual cash
invested--the loss, incidentally, looms even greater. On the other
hand, we must not forget that however the Mexicans may claim that the
increase in values represents an “exploitation” of their country’s
resources, the concomitant advance in all values throughout the land
in the era of Diaz was almost entirely the direct result of those same
foreign enterprises.
From many sources, including of course the two authorities which have
been quoted, I have estimated the American investment of actual cash
capital and have set against it the losses in actual physical damage
and in ruined business, since 1910, as follows:
AMERICAN CAPITAL IN MEXICO
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account