Mexico -- Commerce; Mexico -- Economic conditions; Mexico -- Politics and government -- 1910-1946
The confiscation of the railway properties by the Mexican government
under Carranza is one of the most astonishing and illuminating
pages in the whole story of Carranza’s campaign against capital and
the foreigners. But although it began with him, it apparently has
continued into the rule of his successors--for they seem a part of
the revolution of which he was and still is the dominating, sinister
genius. Under the terms of the merger of 1907, the Mexican government
was given the voting power--but not the title to--50 per cent of the
stock of the company, under certain definite conditions laid down by
the bondholders. This 50 per cent interest represented no capital
invested, nor was it a recognition of any debt which the railways
might have imagined they owed the government. It was given outright in
consideration of one thing, the guaranteeing by the Mexican government
of a return of 4 per cent interest on the bonds of the merged lines. To
the merger the government contributed nothing of tangible value--save
one short line of railway worth about $5,000. Its permission was
needed, perhaps, for the transfer of the railway concessions to the
merger, but this would probably have been given without question had it
been asked alone. The interests back of the merger believed that the
Mexican government guarantee of the interest on the bonds was worth
the gift of the voting right of half the common stock--and on this
understanding alone it was given.
The taking over of the physical property by the Mexican government
followed the American occupation of Vera Cruz in 1914, and shortly
afterwards Carranza made his claim official, on the ground of the 50
per cent voting right! On the basis of this right alone the Mexican
government to-day holds control of the National Railways of Mexico,
a right once given on the solemn guarantee of the interest on the
bonds--which has not been paid for eight years--and with the recognized
provision that the bondholders should name the president of the lines,
and various officials and members of the board--and to-day there is
not one official who is not a creature of the government which happens
to be in power in Mexico!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account