Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: Are these two defendants represented by counsel
here present this morning?
MR. MCHANEY: I think that Rudolf Brandt answered “Yes”.
DEFENDANT BLOME: Yes, your Honor.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: Has this motion been served upon counsel for
these two defendants?
MR. MCHANEY: Your Honor, my understanding is that the motion for
amendment was filed with the Secretary General. If we understand the
rules correctly, the Secretary General then serves it upon the
defendants.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: I was just asking for information whether they
had received copies of the motion.
MR. MCHANEY: That I don’t know. Yes, the counsel for these defendants
say “Yes”.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: Does counsel for defendant Blome raise any
objection to the amendment of the indictment?
DR. SAUTER: No.
DR. KAUFFMANN: Kauffmann for Rudolf Brandt. I have no objection to the
change.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: You represent Rudolf Brandt?
DR. KAUFFMANN: Yes.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: Well, the other defendant affected is defendant
Blome, I understand. Is he represented here?
DR. SAUTER: Dr. Sauter for the defendant Blome. We don’t have any
objection.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: The indictment will be amended in accordance with
the motion.
Is it agreeable to counsel for these two defendants that the arraignment
as to them upon this count which has just been amended be considered as
pleas to the count as amended now—their pleas of “Not Guilty”?
DR. SAUTER: Yes.
DR. KAUFFMANN: Yes.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: These matters will appear in the records of the
Tribunal. The pleas of the defendants will all be entered in the minutes
of the Tribunal.
III. STATEMENT OF THE TRIBUNAL ON THE ORDER OF TRIAL AND RULES OF
PROCEDURE, 9 DECEMBER 1946[6]
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: I have a statement which I desire to make for the
benefit of the prosecution, defendants, and all concerned: Before
opening the trial of Case No. 1, _The United States of America against
Karl Brandt, et al._, there are certain matters which the Tribunal
desires to call to the attention of the counsel for the prosecution and
the counsel for the defendants.
1. The prosecution may be allowed, for the purpose of making the opening
statement in this case, time not to exceed one trial day. This time may
be allocated by the chief prosecutor, between himself and any of his
assistants, as he desires.
2. When the prosecution has rested its case, defense counsel will be
allowed two trial days in which to make their opening statements, and
which will comprehend the entire theory of their respective defenses.
The time allocated will be divided between the different defense
counsel, as they may themselves agree. In the event the defense counsel
cannot agree, the Tribunal will allocate the time, not to exceed 30
minutes to each defendant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account