Triumphs and Wonders of the 19th Century: The True Mirror of a Phenomenal Era: A volume of original, entertaining and instructive historic and descriptive writings, showing the many and marvellous achievements which distinguish an hundred years of material, intellectual, social and moral progressBoyd, James P. (James Penny)
History
Triumphs and Wonders of the 19th Century: The True Mirror of a Phenomenal Era: A volume of original, entertaining and instructive historic and descriptive writings, showing the many and marvellous achievements which distinguish an hundred years of material, intellectual, social and moral progress
Boyd, James P. (James Penny)
Inventions; Progress
Subsequently, Hertz showed that the cathodic rays would penetrate thin
sheets of metal placed within the tube or bulb; and soon after, Paul
Lenard (1894) demonstrated that the cathodic ray could be investigated
as well outside of the tube or bulb as within it. He set an aluminum
plate in the glass wall of the bulb opposite the cathode. Though
ordinary light could not penetrate the aluminum plate, it was readily
pierced by the cathodic rays, to a distance of three inches beyond its
outside surface. With these rays, thus freed from their inclosure, he
produced the same fluorescent effects as had been noted within the
bulb, and even secured some photographic effects. These cathodic rays
produced no effect on the eye, which proved their dissimilarity to
light. Lenard showed further that the cathodic rays outside of the tube
could be deflected from their straight course by a magnet, that they
might pass through substances opaque to light, and that in so passing
they might cast a shadow of objects less opaque, which shadow could be
photographed. Now Professor Roentgen came upon the scene. He had been
conducting his experiments in Germany, along the same lines as Lenard,
and had reached practically the same results as to the penetrative,
fluorescent, and photographic effects of the cathodic rays. But he
had gone still further, and, in 1896, fairly set the scientific world
aflame with the announcement that all the effects produced by Lenard
in the limited space of a few inches could also be produced at long
distances from the tube, and with sufficient intensity to depict solid
substances within or behind other substances sufficiently solid to
be impermeable by light. Professor Roentgen claims that his X ray is
different from the cathodic ray of Lenard and others, because it cannot
be deflected by a magnet. This claim has given rise to much controversy
respecting the real nature of the X ray, a controversy not likely to
end soon, yet one full of inspiration to further investigation.
[Illustration: SCIAGRAPH OR SHADOW PICTURE.
By X Ray process.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account