Views and Reviews: Essays in appreciation: LiteratureHenley, William Ernest
History
Views and Reviews: Essays in appreciation: Literature
Henley, William Ernest
English literature -- History and criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
The fact is, the translator too often forgets the difference between his
subject and himself; he is too often a common graveyard mason that would
play the sculptor. And it is not nearly enough for him to be a decent
craftsman. To give an adequate idea of an artist's work a man must be
himself an artist of equal force and versatility with his original. The
typical translator makes clever enough verses, but Heine's accomplishment
is remote from him as Heine's genius. He perverts his author as rhyme
and rhythm will. No charge of verbal inaccuracy need therefore be made,
for we do not expect a literal fidelity in our workman. Let him convey
the spirit of his original, and that, so far as meaning goes, is enough.
But we do expect of him a something that shall recall his author's form,
his author's personality, his author's charm of diction and of style; and
here it is that such an interpreter as Sir Theodore Martin (say) fails
with such assurance and ill-fortune. The movement of Heine's rhythms,
simple as they seem, is not spontaneous; it is an effect of art: the poet
laboured at his cadences as at his meanings. Artificial he is, but he
has the wonderful quality of never seeming artificial. His verses dance
and sway like the nixies he loved. Their every motion seems informed
with the perfect suavity and spontaneity of pure nature. They tinkle
down the air like sunset bells, they float like clouds, they wave like
flowers, they twitter like skylarks, they have in them something of the
swiftness and the certainty of exquisite physical sensations. In such a
transcript as Sir Theodore's all this is lost: Heine becomes a mere
prentice-metrist; he sets the teeth on edge as surely as Browning
himself; the verse that recalled a dance of naiads suggests a springless
cart on a Highland road; Terpsichore is made to prance a hobnailed
breakdown. The poem disappears, and in its place you have an indifferent
copy of verses. You look at the pages from afar, and your impression is
that they are not unlike Heine; you look into them, and Heine has
vanished. The man is gone, and only an awkward, angular, clumsily
articulated, entirely preposterous lay-figure remains to show that the
translator has been by.
MATTHEW ARNOLD
His Verse.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account