But William Wroth was not the only Welsh clergyman to be treated in
this fashion. In 1638 William Erbery, Vicar of St. Mary's, Cardiff,
was likewise deprived of his living; and became the first Minister of
an Independent Church in that city. His curate, Walter Cradock, was
deprived of his licence in 1633, and became one of the most
influential patriotic teachers of the period. He it was who
converted the famous Vavasour Powell, and the even more famous Morgan
Llwyd.
{169}
CHAPTER XI
THE CIVIL WAR
The Great Civil War was the last occasion on which Welshmen have
fought upon the soil of their native land. The old order was giving
place to the new. Henceforward the heroes of Wales were not
soldiers, but poets, scholars, and, above all, preachers. A last
flicker of the old martial spirit, the old lust of battle, is seen in
the struggle between King and Parliament. To write the history of
Wales between 1642 and 1649 would simply be to narrate the incidents
of the Civil War, for no part of the country played a more prominent
part in the contest than did the Principality. Here, however, it
must suffice to disentangle from the rest that which was peculiarly
Welsh, and to draw attention to a few Welshmen who rendered
themselves illustrious.
It is well known that, at the outbreak of the war, the cleavage
between the partisans {170} of Charles and those of Parliament
followed geographical, racial, and professional, rather than social,
lines. To say that the upper classes were for the King, and the
lower classes for the Commons, would contain rather more fiction than
truth. At most all that can be said is that the aristocracy, the
squirearchy, and the peasantry, were, on the whole, favourable to the
King; while the substantial farmers, and the trading and commercial
classes were mainly inclined towards Parliament. Large numbers of
all these classes were, however, to be found on both sides. But the
geographical division is far more clear and certain. If a line be
drawn from Hull to Gloucester, and then on to Plymouth, it can be
said roughly that all the country to the east and south of it was for
Parliament, and everything to the west and north for Charles. It is
further to be observed that High Churchmen and Catholics favoured the
Royalist cause, while the Dissenters were to a man upholders of the
Commons. About the attitude of Wales there was, from the very first,
no question: it was well nigh unanimously Royalist. Why that should
have been so it is difficult to explain; except on the facile
assumption {171} that the Welsh people were either preternaturally
enlightened or else preternaturally stupid. The Tudors had been of
Welsh blood, and the intense loyalty which they evoked in Welsh
hearts was only natural; but the Stuarts were only remotely descended
from Welsh ancestors, and in most respects were more thoroughly alien
than pure Englishmen would have been. Nor had they conferred any
benefits upon Wales.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account