Mr. EISENBERG. By the way, Mr. Latona, on 649 there seems to be a scotch tape or cellophane tape over the fingerprint, is that right? Mr. LATONA. That is right. Mr. EISENBERG. Now, apparently there was no attempt at a lift being made here? Mr. LATONA. No. This evidently was a print which was developed directly on the paper itself. The employing of that adhesive material like scotch tape was to protect the print itself. Had they tried to lift that up I am afraid they would have spoiled that because they would have lifted the fibers of the cardboard along with it. Mr. EISENBERG. Is that why, you think, they didn't lift it? Mr. LATONA. Yes; very definitely. Mr. EISENBERG. By the way, did the Dallas police take photographs of the lift which we had earlier, the lift which was apparently taken from Exhibit 139, or to put the question--actually I am not interested in whether they took photographs of the lift; do you know whether they took photographs of the print? Mr. LATONA. I don't know. Mr. EISENBERG. Is it normal to take a photograph of a print before it is lifted? Mr. LATONA. If it is fairly visible, yes. Mr. EISENBERG. What is the purpose of the lift, as opposed to a photograph reproducing the print? Mr. LATONA. The purpose of the lift is simply to insure the probability of getting a good record of the print, because a lot of times when you photograph a print, you have to go through the process of having it developed and then printed and at the same time by lifting it you may, that would be an additional security that you are getting the best results. Then you take your choice as to which result turns out the best. Mr. EISENBERG. So these are alternative routes? Mr. LATONA. That is right. Mr. EISENBERG. Lifting and photographing? Mr. LATONA. That is right. Well, primarily our recommendation in the FBI is simply every procedure to photograph and then lift. Then you choose the one which you feel gives you the best results in your final photograph. Mr. EISENBERG. Returning to the palmprint on 649, taken from the carton 648, did you make up a chart showing some of the points---- Mr. LATONA. Yes. Mr. EISENBERG. Which led you to your conclusion that that print was the print of Lee Harvey Oswald? Mr. LATONA. Yes, I did. Mr. EISENBERG. And was that prepared by you or under your supervision? Mr. LATONA. Prepared by me--under my supervision. Mr. EISENBERG. May I have this chart admitted as 652? Mr. DULLES. It will be admitted as Exhibit 652. (The chart referred to was marked Commission Exhibit No. 652, for identification and received in evidence.) Mr. EISENBERG. Again, without going into detail, Mr. Latona, could you show us some of the more salient points which led you to your conclusion that the print on 649 was the palmprint of Lee Harvey Oswald?