William Cobbett: A Biography in Two Volumes, Vol. 1Smith, Edward
History
William Cobbett: A Biography in Two Volumes, Vol. 1
Smith, Edward
Cobbett, William 1763-1835
“Plainly seeing what was going forward, I, on the 7th of March,
made, in a _letter to Mr. Pitt_, a representation of the whole
case, giving him a history of the obstacles I had met with,
which letter concluded thus: ‘I have now, sir, done all a man
can do in such a case. I have proceeded regularly, and I may
add, respectfully, from first to last; if I am allowed to serve
my country by prosecuting men who have injured it, I shall do
it; if I am thwarted and pressed down by those whose office it
is to assist and support me, I cannot do it; in either case, I
shall be satisfied with having done my duty, and shall leave
the world to make a comparison between me and the men whom
I have accused.’ This letter (which, by-the-bye, the public
robbers have not published) had the effect of changing the
place of the court-martial, which was now to be held in London;
but, as to my other great ground of complaint, the leaving
of the _regimental books unsecured_, it had no effect at all;
and it will be recollected that, without those books, there
could be, as to most of the weighty charges, no proof adduced
without bringing forward _Corporal Bestland_, and the danger
of doing that will be presently seen. But now, mark well as to
these books: as to this great source of that kind of evidence
which was not to be brow-beaten, or stifled by the dangers of
the lash. Mark well these facts, and from them judge of what I
had to expect in the way of justice. On the 22nd of _January_
I wrote to Sir George Yonge, for the express purpose of having
the books secured; that is to say, taken out of the hands and
put out of the reach of the parties accused. On the 24th of
January he told me that HE HAD _taken care to give directions_
to have these documents secured. On the 18th of February, in
answer to a letter, in which I (upon information received from
the regiment) complained of the documents not having been
secured, he wrote to me--and I have now the letter before me,
signed with his own hand--that he would write to the colonel
of the regiment about the books, &c.: ‘although,’ says he, ‘I
cannot doubt but that the regimental books _have been_ properly
secured.’ This was on the 18th of February, mind; and now it
appears, from the documents which the public-robbers have put
forth, that the first time any order for securing the books was
given was on the _15th of March_, though the Secretary told
me he had done it on the _24th of January_, and repeated his
assertion in writing on the _18th of February_. There is quite
enough in this fact alone, to show the public what sort of a
chance I stood of obtaining justice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account