William Shakespeare: A Critical StudyBrandes, Georg
General
William Shakespeare: A Critical Study
Brandes, Georg
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 -- Criticism and interpretation
The First Quarto of _Romeo and Juliet_ was published in 1597,
with the following
title: _An excellent conceited Tragedie of Romeo and Juliet. As it
hath been often (with great applause) plaid publiquely, by the right
Honourable the L. of Hunsdon his Seruants._ Lord Hunsdon died in July
1596, during his tenure of office as Lord Chamberlain; his successor in
the title was appointed to the office in April 1597; in the interim his
company of actors was not called the Lord Chamberlain's, but only Lord
Hunsdon's servants, and it must, therefore, have been at this time that
the play was first acted.
Many things, however, suggest a much earlier origin for it, and the
Nurse's allusion to the earthquake (i. 3) is of especial importance in
determining its date. She says--
"'Tis since the earthquake now eleven years;"
and a little later--
"And since that time it is eleven years."
There had been an earthquake in England in the year 1580. But we must
not, of course, take too literally the babble of a garrulous old
servant.
But even if Shakespeare began to work upon the theme in 1591, there is
no doubt that, according to his frequent practice, he went through the
play again, revised and remoulded it, somewhere between that date and
1599, when it appeared in the Second Quarto almost in the form in which
we now possess it. This Second Quarto has on its title-page the words,
"newly corrected, augmented and amended." Not until the fourth edition
does the author's name appear.
No one can doubt that Tycho Mommsen and that excellent Shakespeare
scholar Halliwell-Phillips are right in declaring the 1597 Quarto to be
a pirated edition. But it by no means follows that the complete text of
1599 already existed in 1597, and was merely carelessly abridged. In
view of those passages (such as the seventh scene of the second act)
where a whole long sequence of dialogue is omitted as superfluous, and
where the old text is replaced by one totally new and very much better,
this impression will not hold ground.
We have here, then, as elsewhere--but seldom so indubitably and
obviously as here--a play of Shakespeare's at two different stages of
its development.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account