A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 1: Ancient and Mediæval PhilosophyCushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy
A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 1: Ancient and Mediæval Philosophy
Cushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy -- History
=What is Scholasticism?= In a general sense scholasticism is
philosophic thought, but historically the term is usually restricted
to the philosophic thinking of the Middle Ages. It has been pointed
out that scholastic philosophy does not differ from any other
philosophy. It had its prejudices, its dependence on authority, its
employment of deduction, its use of observation――like all philosophy.
The scholasticism of this time, however, is distinguished by its
general reference to church dogma as authority and its imperfect use
of experience. The scholasticism of the Middle Ages may therefore
be defined as the application of dialectic or logical methods to the
discussion of theological problems. It was the attempt to present the
doctrine of the church in a scientific system of philosophy. Sometimes
such an attempt resulted in heresy when the result was a changing of
dogma. Generally, however, the scholastic was not so ambitious, for
he usually sought to keep within the authoritative doctrines of the
church. He feared the anathema of the church. Scholasticism therefore,
in general, had two characteristics: (1) It assumed that church dogma
was unquestionable and infallible; (2) It tried to clarify dogma by
rational explanation, or to show that dogma was at least not contrary
to reason. Dogma may in some cases be explained by the reason. In some
cases it may be so far above reason that the only thing the reason
can say is, “The doctrine does not contradict me.” In the words
of an eminent churchman, “Dogma says, _Deus homo_ (God became man).
Scholasticism asks, _Cur deus homo?_ (Why did God become man?)”
Revelation is assumed; scholastic philosophy is permitted; independent
rational science is denied. The remainder of the history of the Middle
Ages shows no conscious attempt to form a new body of doctrine for the
church; and only here and there does there appear an effort to modify
the existing doctrine. The thinkers are employed in this scholastic
clarifying of the doctrine. In this period scholasticism takes the form
of the logical problem of the relation of universals and particulars.
In the period of Classic Scholasticism this logical problem changes
into the metaphysical one of the respective scopes of reason and faith.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account