A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern PhilosophyCushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy
A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern Philosophy
Cushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy -- History
=The Method of Descartes.= Both science and scholasticism show
themselves in the method of Descartes. He attempted to construct
a philosophical method entirely in the scientific spirit of the
Renaissance, but in the application of it he showed his scholastic
training. Surfeited with inadequate and traditional methods he felt
the need of some single principle by which all knowledge might be
systematized, and he was sure that mathematics would furnish the
key. Rational science was to Descartes only mathematics. Truth is
to be found not in metaphysics, nor in empirical science. Descartes’
philosophical aim was to establish a universal mathematics. Descartes
was not entirely faithful to Galileo’s mathematical principle in his
employment of it, and his influence in metaphysics was thereby all the
greater; for in the development of his method he found assistance in
the traditional scholastic methods. Descartes was original in insisting
upon finding the existence of an absolute and undeniable principle
before any progress could be made. Such an absolute principle can be
obtained only by an _inductive sifting of all ideas_. From this all
further truths must be obtained by _deduction_. Every true philosophy
must therefore be an induction or analysis of ideas, and secondly,
a deduction or synthesis. _The great contribution of Descartes was
therefore this: to the inductive method of Bacon and the deductive
method of Galileo, he added an absolute principle which must be taken
as the basis of both induction and deduction._[27]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account