A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern PhilosophyCushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy
A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Modern Philosophy
Cushman, Herbert Ernest
Philosophy -- History
Leibnitz became court councilor and librarian to the Duke of Hanover
(Brunswick-Lüneburg). He was involved in a multitude of administrative,
historical, and political tasks, and he carried on an enormous
correspondence. Among other things he wrote the history of the reigning
family, which necessitated his going to Rome and Vienna. In 1684
he published his discovery of the differential calculus, over which
arose the celebrated controversy as to whether he or Newton made the
prior discovery. In 1686, in his fortieth year, he constructed his
philosophical system. However, he showed his affiliation to the coming
age by introducing into his system in 1697 the term “monad.” _Nearly
all his important works were produced in this period._ In 1700 he
founded the Academy of Sciences in Berlin. He was instrumental in the
founding of an academy at St. Petersburg, and he planned academies at
Dresden and Vienna.
=The Three Influences upon the Thought of Leibnitz.=
(1) _His Early Classical Studies._ The father of Leibnitz, who was a
professor of moral philosophy at Leipsic, died when his son was young.
Left much to himself, the boy spent his time in his father’s library.
At eight years he had acquired Latin; at twelve he had read Seneca,
Pliny, Quintilian, Herodotus, Xenophon, Cicero, Plato, the Roman
historians, the Greek and Latin fathers. He became so absorbed in
scholastic studies that his friends feared that he would not leave
them, “not knowing that my mind could not be satisfied with only one
kind of thing.” There can be no question that this scholastic training
gave him a first hand and sympathetic appreciation of scholastic
philosophy. The Aristotelian conception of cosmic purpose, which he got
at this time, never left him. Among the writers of the Natural Science
Period he alone returned to Aristotle. He made Aristotle’s teleological
cause an integral part of his doctrine. His motto finally became, in
his _Theodicy_, “Everything is best in this best of possible worlds.”
While for a time he turned from Aristotle to Descartes, in his final
construction of his theory he borrowed more from Aristotle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account