There is one other effect of hypnosis that we have not spoken of in
detail, and that is of great psychological interest; the somnambulist,
we said, will _perceive_ as the operator wishes him to perceive,
will take coal for sugar and ink for wine. It has long been debated
whether this statement is literally true. The hypnotised subject
behaves _as if_ he perceived the sugar and the wine; but is there any
reason to think that he actually perceives them? Or if the suggestion
is negative, and the subject is told that a certain person has left
the room, he will behave _as if_ that person were no longer present;
but does he actually fail to see him? May not the suggestion bear
directly upon the subject’s conduct, and leave his perceptions
unchanged? The facts point in both directions. Many of the apparent
changes of perception are, in all probability, nothing more than
changes of behaviour towards the perceptual stimuli; but there is,
all the same, no impossibility in a change of perception itself. We
have already noted the negative effects of abstraction (p. 281); and
recent experiments with normal subjects seem to show conclusively that
a suggestion, a form of words that carries the force of a command, may
set up the mental process, or the change of mental processes, normally
correlated with presence or change of external stimulus. A red, seen
under the suggestion of blue, will not only be reported _as_ bluish,
but will actually _look_ bluish; and a thermally indifferent impression
will not only be reported _as_ warm or cold, but will actually be
_felt_ warm or cold. If such things happen in the normal waking life,
they may assuredly happen in the narrowed and intensive suggestibility
of the hypnotic state.
References
A. Moll, Hypnotism, 1891; W. Wundt, Lectures on Human and Animal
Psychology, 1896, Lect. xxii.; M. de Manacéïne, Sleep, 1897; J.
Jastrow, Fact and Fable in Psychology, 1900; E. Jones, Freud’s Theory
of Dreams, in American Journal of Psychology, xxi., April 1910, 283
ff.; S. Ferenczi, The Psychological Analysis of Dreams, _ibid._, 309
ff.; M. Bentley, The Study of Dreams, _ibid._, xxvi., April 1915, 196
ff.
INDEX OF NAMES
Angelo, M., 299.
Aristotle, 25, 41, 84, 142 f., 145 ff., 168, 175, 218, 305.
Arnold, M., 305.
Bacon, F., 34, 313.
Bain, A., 229, 257, 260, 324, 334.
Baldwin, J. M., 41, 72, 89, 334.
Barrie, J. M., 247.
Bastian, H. C., 72.
Beethoven, L. van, 196.
Bentley, M., 349.
Bergson, H., 229.
Berkeley, G., 264, 289.
Blagden, C. O., 72.
Boas, F., 303, 306.
Bradley, F. H., 174, 176.
Bridgman, L., 27, 41.
Buridan, J., 247.
Burr, A. R., 39.
Cannon, W. B., 220 f., 229.
Carpenter, W. B., 108 f., 111.
Carroll, L., 21.
Charcot, J. M., 139, 143.
Chavannes, P. de, 196.
Clifford, W. K., 38.
Dalton, J., 58, 72.
Darwin, C., 3, 51, 222 f., 225, 228 f.
Da Vinci, L., 228.
Deland, M., 175.
Descartes, R., 228.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account