A Bible School Manual: Studies in the Book of Revelation: An introduction, analysis, and notes, containing a concise interpretation according to the symbolic view, numerous references to authorities, and general mention of other interpretations, with the text of the American revised version edited in paragraphs, for the use of Bible studentsHunter, Stephen Alexander
Religion
A Bible School Manual: Studies in the Book of Revelation: An introduction, analysis, and notes, containing a concise interpretation according to the symbolic view, numerous references to authorities, and general mention of other interpretations, with the text of the American revised version edited in paragraphs, for the use of Bible students
Hunter, Stephen Alexander
Bible. Revelation -- Commentaries
387 “This description of the glorified Lord, sublime as a purely mental
conception, becomes intolerable if we give it outward form and
expression.” (Trench, _Ep’s to Seven Ch’s_, p. 64). In fact, “No
scene in the great Christian Apocalypse can be successfully
reproduced upon canvas; the imagery ... is symbolic and not
pictorial,” (Swete, _Apoc. of St. John_, Intr., p. cxxxiv.)
“Symbolism does not appeal to the pictorial sense at all, but rather
to some analytic faculty, or conventional association of ideas.”
(Moulton, _Bib. Idyls_, Intr. p. xx). The incongruity of many of
their symbols from the aesthetic point of view does not seem to have
occurred to the Hebrew mind, for with them the religious idea was
predominant. Many of the events recorded in the Revelation are
manifestly impossible except in a vision.
388 “Here we have the ideas of ch. 1. 5 repeated (i. e. of the love and
redemption of Christ) with the further thought that love like that
displayed in Christ’s death for man’s redemption is worthy not only
of all praise, but of having all the future committed to its care.
It is really a pictorial way of saying that redeeming love is the
last reality in the universe which all praise must exalt and to
which everything else must be subordinate.” Denney, _Death of
Christ_, p. 246.
389 Moulton’s _Mod. Read. Bib._, Psa. vol. i, Intr., p. xxxiif.
390 The call is most naturally understood as a call for the vision to
appear. Simcox so interprets: “Each of the living creatures by turns
summons one of the horsemen.” (_Cambr. Gr. Test._, Rev., p. 85);
Scott, also, holds the same view (_New Cent. Bib._, Rev., p. 176);
and Moffatt, prefers it (_New Trans. New Test._, footnote). Plummer,
however, says the call is addressed to John,—perhaps a more common
view; on the other hand Alford, Milligan, and Swete, say the call is
to Christ to come. The view that the call is addressed to the rider
is more likely correct, though the interpretation of the seals is
not materially affected by the view we may take of this part of the
symbolism. In any case, “Each living being invites attention to the
revelation of the future of that creation of which they are all
representatives.” _Pulp. Com._, Rev., p. 185.
391 “_Conquering, and that he may conquer._ This is the key to the whole
vision. Only of Christ and his kingdom can it be said that it is to
conquer ... only of Christ’s kingdom shall there be no end.”
Plummer, _Pulp. Com._, Rev., p. 184.
392 _New Cent. Bib._, Rev., p. 179; also see Mommsen’s _Provinces of
Rom. Emp._, vol. ii, p. 1 (note), Swete regards the first seal as “a
picture of triumphant militarism.” _Apoc. St. John_, p. 84.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account