A Body of Divinity, Vol. 1 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 1 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
We may add
further that almost three hundred years before Christ, by the care of
the _Egyptian_ kings, the Hebrew books were translated into Greek by
those who are called the _Seventy_; that the Greeks might have them in
another language, but the sense the same in the main; upon which
account they were the less liable to be altered: And the same books
were translated into _Chaldee_, and into the _Jerusalem_ language;
that is, half _Syriac_; partly a little before, and partly a little
after Christ’s time. After which followed other _Greek_ versions, that
of _Aquila_, _Symmachus_, and _Theodotion_; which _Origen_, and others
after him, compared with the seventy Interpreters, and found no
difference in the history; or in any weighty matters. _Philo_
flourished in _Caligula’s_ time, and Josephus lived till
_Vespasian’s_. Each of them quote out of the _Hebrew_ books the same
things that we find at this day. By this time the Christian religion
began to be more and more spread, and many of its professors were
_Hebrews_: Many had studied the _Hebrew_ learning, who could very
easily have perceived and discovered it, if the _Jews_ had received
any thing that was false, in any remarkable subject, I mean, by
comparing it with more ancient books. But they not only do this, but
they bring very many testimonies out of the Old Testament, plainly in
that sense in which they are received amongst the _Hebrews_, which
_Hebrews_ may be convicted of any crime, sooner than (I will not say
of falsity, but) of negligence, in relation to these books; because
they used to transcribe and compare them so very scrupulously, that
they could tell how often every letter came over. We may add, in the
first place, an argument, and that no mean one, why the _Jews_ did not
alter the scripture designedly; because the Christians prove, and as
they think very strongly, that their Master Jesus was that very
Messiah who was of old promised to the forefathers of the _Jews_; and
this from those very books, which were read by the _Jews_. Which the
_Jews_ would have taken the greatest care should never have been,
after there arose a controversy between them and the Christians; if it
had ever been in their power to have altered what they would.”
GROTIUS.
Footnote 21:
(_Thus the_ Phoenician _Annals_, &c.) See what _Josephus_ cites out of
them, Book VIII. Chap. 2. of his Ancient History; where he adds, “that
if any one would see the Copies of those Epistles which _Solomon_ and
_Hirom_ wrote to each other, they may be procured of the public
Keepers of the Records at _Tyrus_.” (We must be cautions how we
believe this; however, see what I have said upon 1 _Kings_ v. 3.)
There is a remarkable place concerning _David_, quoted by _Josephus_,
Book VII. Ch. 6. of his Ancient History, out of the IVth of
_Damascenus’s_ History.
Footnote 22:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account