A Body of Divinity, Vol. 1 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 1 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
(5.) The consideration of the faithfulness of God should be improved, to
humble, and fill us with shame and confusion of face, when we consider
how treacherously we have dealt with him, how unsteadfast we have been
in his covenant, how often we have broke our own promises and
resolutions that we would walk more closely with him, how frequently we
have backslidden from him, contrary to all the engagements which we have
been laid under. Have we found any unfaithfulness in him? Has he, in the
least instance, been worse than his word? as God says, when he reproves
his people, _What iniquity have your fathers found in me, that they are
gone far from me, and have walked after vanity, and are become vain?_
Jer. ii. 5.
Footnote 48:
His ideas are not the effects, but causes of things. Vide post p. 124,
125.
Footnote 49:
There is not succession in His ideas, but he exists in every point of
time.
Footnote 50:
Effects spring from _power_, not _laws_, and prove a _virtual_, or
influential, revelation, an _essential_ ubiquity.
Footnote 51:
Quest. xv. and xviii.
Footnote 52:
Quest. lxvii.
Footnote 53:
Vide Edwards on Free-will, part I. sect. IV.
Footnote 54:
The Divine knowledge is as undeniable as the Divine existence, and as
certain as human knowledge. “He that formed the eye doth he not see?
He that planted the ear doth he not hear? He that teacheth man
knowledge doth he not know?” But though human knowledge proves the
Divine, as the effect does its cause, it by no means follows, that
they are similar. Our knowledge principally consists of the images of
things in the mind, or springs from them; but if the Divine knowledge
were such, it would result that things were prior to his knowledge,
and so that he is not the Creator of them; all things must therefore
be the representations of his ideas, as an edifice represents the plan
of the skilful architect. On this account our knowledge is
superficial, extending only to the external appearances of things; but
their intimate natures are known to him, who made them conformed to
his original ideas. Our knowledge is circumscribed, extending only to
the things which are the objects of our senses, or which have been
described to us; but the universe, with all its parts, the greatest
and the smallest things, are all known to him, who called them into
existence, and moulded them according to his own plan. Our knowledge
embraces only the things which are, or have been; with respect to the
future, we can know nothing, except as he, upon whom it depends, shall
reveal it to us; or as we may draw inferences from his course of
action in former instances. But the Creator knows not only the past
and the present, but the future. He knows the future, because it
wholly depends on him; and nothing can take place without him,
otherwise it is independent of God, but this is incompatible with his
supremacy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account