A Body of Divinity, Vol. 2 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 2 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
Contempt and ridicule will come. But the Christian should know that
this indicates defect in the authors of them. If religion were, as the
infidel hopes it will prove, without foundation, to ridicule the
conscientious man for his weakness, is rudeness, weakness, and want of
generosity. If religion be doubtful, to ridicule it is to run the
hazard of Divine resentment, and highly imprudent. If it be certain,
it is to rush upon the bosses of God’s buckler, and the most horrid
insolence.
Ridicule is no test of truth, for the greatest and most important
truths may be subjected to wit; it is no index of strength of
understanding; and wit and great knowledge almost never are found
together. It indicates nothing noble or generous, but a little
piddling genius, and contemptible pride.
He who yields to the shame of that which is good, weakens his powers
of resistance, provokes the Spirit of grace, hardens his conscience,
strengthens the hands of the enemy, excites the contempt of the wicked
themselves, grieves his follow Christians, affronts God to his face,
and incurs the judgment of Christ “Whosoever is ashamed of me and my
words, of him will I be ashamed.”
Quest. XXII.
QUEST. XXII. _Did all mankind fall in that first transgression?_
ANSW. The covenant being made with Adam, as a public person, not for
himself only, but for his posterity, all mankind descending from him
by ordinary generation, sinned in him, and fell with him in that
first transgression.
Having shewn, in the foregoing answer how our first parents sinned and
fell, we are now led to consider, how their fall affected all their
posterity, whom they represented; and accordingly it is said, that the
covenant was made with Adam, as a federal head, not for himself only,
but all his posterity; so that they sinned in, and fell with him. But,
before we enter more particularly on this subject, it may not be
improper to enquire, whether this character, of being the head of the
covenant, respects only Adam, or both our first parents? I am sensible
there are many who think this covenant was made with Adam, as the head
of his posterity, exclusive of Eve; so that, as he did not represent her
therein, but his seed, she was not, together with him, the
representative of mankind; therefore, though the covenant was made with
her, and she was equally obliged to perform the conditions thereof, yet
she was only to stand or fall for herself, her concern herein being only
personal; and therefore it follows, from hence, that when she fell,
being _first in the transgression_, all mankind could not be said to sin
and fall in her, as they did in Adam; therefore, if she alone had
sinned, she would have perished alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account