A Body of Divinity, Vol. 2 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 2 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
3. Since this corruption of nature so early discovers itself, and abides
in us, as long as we are in this world, let us take heed that we do not
use means to increase it, by giving way to presumptuous sins; or
endeavour to excite or draw it forth, either in ourselves, or others;
for this will occasion abundance of actual transgressions.
Thus having considered that guilt which we bring with us into the world,
and that corruption of nature, which discovers itself, as soon as we
appear to be intelligent creatures, or are capable of any disposition to
sin; we proceed to speak concerning the misery and punishment that
ensues hereupon.
Footnote 67:
_See Quest._ cv.-cli.
Footnote 68:
Gen. vi. 5. Is a picture of antideluvian iniquity, it not only proves
that guilt was universal, and all men affected; that it was general,
the greater portion of the actions of men being evil; but that the
depravity of every unsanctified man was total, extending not merely to
his _thoughts_, but to his _imagination_ יצר, the first _frame_ or
_form_ of the thoughts. They were not partially, but _only evil_, and
that not occasionally but _continually_. Yet the race who were
destroyed, must have performed relative duties, parental and filial;
and the tribes seem to have lived as free from war, at least, as those
who have existed since the flood. If crimes before the flood exceeded
in degree and multitude those of modern times, yet if they differed
not in their nature, it will follow, that when the unrenewed in our
days, are kind parents, dutiful children, honest men, and good
citizens, they may be totally depraved; the “_imagination of the
thoughts of their hearts may be only evil continually_.” As we know
not their hearts, are to judge of them by their fruits, and are
charitably to impute their actions to better motives, we may with
propriety commend what God will condemn. He sees the intentions, and
the aversion of heart to him and holiness, and though he may reward
virtuous conduct in this world, to encourage virtue, yet will
eventually judge righteous judgment, and connect every action with its
motives.
This scripture also shews us not only, that the _material goodness_ of
actions will not recommend them to God, but that _conscientiousness_
in the discharge of relative duties, (for this must have existed
before the flood,) will not recommend them where the love of God,
which is peculiar to the renewed mind, is absent.
Footnote 69:
_The Marcionites in the second century, and the Manichees in the
third._
Footnote 70:
_See Page 54-57, ante._
Footnote 71:
_See a book, supposed to be written in defence hereof by Glanvil,
entitled, Lux Orientalis._
Footnote 72:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account