A Body of Divinity, Vol. 2 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 2 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
_4thly_, His retaining his human nature for ever, seems necessary, as it
redounds to the glory of God: it is an eternal monument of his love to
mankind, and an external means to draw forth their love to him, who
procured those mansions of glory, which they shall for ever be possessed
of, by what he did and suffered for them therein.
Footnote 113:
_See Page 379._ Vol. I.
Footnote 114:
_See Quest._ xliv.
Footnote 115:
_See Vol. I. Page 243._
Footnote 116:
_See Quest._ ix, x, xi.
Footnote 117:
_Vide the note, Vol. I. Page 279._
Footnote 118:
_For this reason, the Sabellians are often called, by ancient writers,
Patripassians._
Footnote 119:
_See the same scriptures, and others to the like purpose, before
cited, for the proof of Christ’s proper deity, under Quest._ ix. x.
xi. _Vol. I. Page 302, to 319, and also what has been said concerning
his Sonship, as implying him to be God-man Mediator. Vol. I. Page 274,
279, &c._
Footnote 120:
_Nestorius was Bishop of Constantinople, in the reign of Theodosius,
the younger, A. D. 428. who very warmly maintained, that the Virgin
Mary was not the mother of that Person that was God, but of a distinct
human Person, called Christ, which was censured and condemned by the
council at Ephesus, A. D. 431._
Footnote 121:
_These are called Eutychians, from Eutyches, an abbot of
Constantinople, who, when he had gained a great deal of reputation, in
disputing against Nestorius, in the council at Ephesus, a few years
after, viz. A. D. 448. propagated his opinion, which was condemned, as
heretical, in the council at Chalcedon, A. D. 451._
Footnote 122:
_This absurd opinion, subversive of Christianity, was propagated by
several among the Gnosticks, in the second century, who, for this
reason, were called Docetæ._
Footnote 123:
αφαντος εγενετο.
Footnote 124:
_See Page 112 ante._
Footnote 125:
_So the Hebrew word ought to be rendered, rather than_ therefore; _for
so it is understood in other scriptures, particularly in Jer._ xxx.
_16._
Footnote 126:
_This is a just distinction relating to signs mentioned in scripture;
in which, sometimes a sign did not take place till the thing
signified, or brought to remembrance thereby, had been accomplished.
See Exod._ iii. _12. 1 Sam._ ii. _34. Isa._ xxxvii. _30. Jer._ xliv.
_29, 30. as Bishop Kidder well observes. See Demonstrat. of the
Messias, Part II. page 105, in Fol._
Footnote 127:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account