A Body of Divinity, Vol. 2 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 2 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
_It was denied, indeed, by the Epicureans, who were detested by the
better sort of heathen, and reckoned the Libertines of the respective
ages, in which they lived; and, though they may occasionally speak of
a God, yet were deemed no better than Atheists._ Diogenes Laertius
[Vid. in Vit. Epicuri, _Lib. X._] _in the close of the life of
Epicurus, gives a brief account of his sentiments about religion,
which he lays down in several short Aphorisms; the first of which
begins with this memorable passage_, Το μακαριον και αφθαρτον ουτε
αυτο πραγματα εχει ουτε αλλω παρεχει, Quod beatum & immortale est
neque ipsum negotia habet, neque alii præbet; _which expression some
of the wiser heathen have taken just offence at. And accordingly
Cicero_, [Vid. ejusd. _Lib. I._ De Nat. Deor.] _referring to this
passage, says, that whatever veneration Epicurus pretended to have for
the gods, yet he was no better than an Atheist, and brought a god into
his philosophy, that he might not fall under the displeasure of the
senate at Athens: thus he says_, Novi ego Epicureos omnia Sigilla
venerantes; quanquam video nonnullis videri Epicurum, ne in
offensionem Atheniensium caderet, verbis reliquisse Deos,
resustulisse: _And Lactantius observes the same thing concerning him,
and describes him as a deceiver and a hypocrite_, Hic vero si aliud
sensit, & aliud locutus est; quid aliud appellandus est, quam
deceptor, bilinguis, malus, & propterea stultus? _Vid. Lactant. de Ira
Dei, Cap. 4. And as for the Poets, it was only the most vain among
them, who gave countenance to immorality, and endeavoured to debauch
the age in which they lived, that gave out this notion; and, in our
age, this seems to be one of the first principles of Deism._
Footnote 38:
Vide ante. Vol. I. p. 532, in note.
Footnote 39:
_See Charnock, Flavell, Dr. Collings, on Providence._
Quest. XIX.
QUEST. XIX. _What is God’s providence towards the angels?_
ANSW. God, by his providence, permitted some of the angels, wilfully
and irrecoverably, to fall into sin and damnation, limiting and
ordering that, and all their sins to his own glory, and established
the rest in holiness and happiness; employing them all at his
pleasure, in the administration of his power, mercy, and justice.
It was observed, in a foregoing answer, that God created all the angels
holy; but, in this, some of them are described as fallen, while the rest
retained their first integrity. And the providence of God is considered,
as conversant about this matter, in different respects. Accordingly it
is said,
I. That God, by his providence, permitted some of the angels to fall.
This appears, by the event, because there are some wicked and impure
spirits, sunk down into the depths of misery, from that state in which
they were created, as the consequence of their rebellion against God.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account