A Body of Divinity, Vol. 3 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 3 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
It is not the _holiness of his faith_ that is accounted for
righteousness to him: faith is a holy duty but not more so than some
others, and not so much so as love, “now abide faith, hope, love, and
the greatest of these is love;” nor are christians ever said to be
justified by love, joy, peace, patience, or by any other grace, except
by faith. From whence it follows that it is not the holiness of faith
for which the believer is justified, and yet that there is some
property not common to any other grace or duty, which must be
concerned in our justification; and no doubt it is because faith lays
hold on him for whose sake alone we can be justified.
Or faith may be put for its object, as the words fear, hope, joy, and
love are; God is our fear, our hope, &c. “Thy faith hath saved thee,”
it was not her faith, but its object, Christ’s power, that healed her.
The seed which was promised embraced Christ, whose day Abraham saw
afar off; so this faith had the Redeemer for its object. In the
epistle to the Galatians there follow the quotation these words, “as
many as are of faith are the children of Abraham,” these are called
his spiritual seed, and believe in Christ, now if all who believe in
Christ are thereby the children of Abraham, and Abraham their father
or pattern of faith, his faith must have been of the same kind. There
could have been little propriety in giving a faith of any other kind
as a pattern to those who are to believe in Christ that they may be
“justified by his blood.”
Footnote 53:
The quotations of Paul and James follow the lxx. in omitting the _in_.
Footnote 54:
Hammond.
Footnote 55:
Whitby. Macknight.
Footnote 56:
Macknight.
Footnote 57:
_This opinion was propagated soon after the reformation, by Andr.
Osiander, who lived a little before the middle of the sixteenth
century._
Footnote 58:
_This opinion was propagated soon after by Stancarus, in opposition to
Osiander, whom Du Pin reckons amongst the Socinians, or, at least,
that after he had advanced this notion, he denied the doctrine of the
Trinity._ [_See Du Pin’s eccl. hist. sixteenth century, book_ iv.
_chap._ 6.]
Footnote 59:
_This is commonly called_ fiducia, _and as such, distinguished from_
fides, _by which the former is generally expressed._
Footnote 60:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account