A Body of Divinity, Vol. 3 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 3 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
This change is more important than all the gifts of providence, if man
therefore be the author of it, he is his own greatest benefactor, and
must have the highest glory. If the Holy Spirit acts no otherwise on
the human soul, than by addressing motives, angelic natures do also
this; and no more power is ascribed to the Searcher of hearts, than to
them. Then also it will follow, that all professing christians are of
the same kind; and that it was improperly said, that they “were not of
us,” who afterwards have “departed from us.” Then also the advice to
those who are in the visible church “to examine,” and “prove
themselves,” whether Christ be “in them,” is without meaning, or
utility; because the thing to be inquired for is notorious, that is,
their visible profession. And to “be born again,” is but “to see the”
visible “kingdom” of Christ: and so the proposition spoken to
Nicodemus was merely identical.
Footnote 19:
_See Charnock, Vol. II. page 220, 221, &c. and Cole on Regeneration._
Footnote 20:
_See Charnock, Vol. II. page 232, who speaking concerning its being an
instrument, appointed by God, for this purpose, says, That God hath
made a combination between hearing and believing; so that believing
comes not without hearing, and whereas he infers from hence, that the
principle of grace is implanted, by hearing and believing the word, he
must be supposed to understand it, concerning the principle deduced
into act, and not his implanting the principle itself._
Footnote 21:
_See Charnock on Regeneration, Vol. II. page 70, 71._
Footnote 22:
_See Quest._ lxxv.
Footnote 23:
When it is said “_no man can come unto me, except the Father who hath
sent me, draw him_,” the negation must be understood as expressive of
_moral_ impotency, and as if it had been said “_ye will not come unto
me that ye might have life_;” but nevertheless as direct proof of the
absolute necessity of divine grace to the salvation of every person
who is saved. That the aid is not merely necessary to the
_understanding_ is evident from the guilt of unregeneracy, and from
the supposition of the Saviour whose reproof implies that it was the
carnality of the _heart_ which created the impotency to come unto or
believe on him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account