_Answ._ To this it may be replied, that the whole strength of this objection depends upon the sense that is given of the Greek particles, which we often render _into_, and _out of_[90]. But this will have no weight with any but those who are unacquainted with the Greek language, since it is so well known to all that understand it, that the former of these particles often signifies _to_, as well as _into_; and the latter _from_, as well as _out of_; as innumerable instances might easily be given, was it needful, from scripture, and other Greek authors, in which the words are applied to those things, that according to the natural signification thereof, cannot be understood as denoting _into_, or _out of_. There is one scripture which no one can suppose is to be taken in any other sense but what is agreeable to our present purpose, _viz._ Mat. xvii. 27. wherein our Saviour bids Peter _Go to the sea[91], and cast an hook, and take the fish that first cometh thence_, &c. where, by _go to the sea_, we can understand nothing else, but go to the sea-shore; and yet the word is the same with that which is, in some other places, rendered _into_. There are other scriptures in which persons are said to _go to the mountain_, or some other places, wherein it would be very improper to say, that they went into the place; though the word be the same with that which in other instances we render _into_. And the word[92] which is sometimes rendered _out of_, is frequently rendered _from_, and can be understood in no other sense: As when it is said, in Luke xi. 31. _The queen of the south came from the utmost parts of the earth, to hear the wisdom of Solomon_; which cannot be understood of her coming _out of_, but _from_ thence. But, this matter being so well known to all that read the New Testament in the original, it is needless for me to give any other instances.[93]