in to the worshyppynge of it, then I saye that in your waye is vndoubted dampnacyon. And so is there greate Ieoperdye in your waye, and none at all in ours. For though he were there in dede, yet do not we synne yf we worshyppe it not. For we are not commaunded to worshyppe the sacrament. But yf he be not there, then do you dampnable Idolatrye. ¶ The consecracyon of the Sacrament. [Sidenote: More.] Now as for a nother quyetnes of euery mans conscyencethys yonge man byddeth euerye man be bolde, whether the blessed sacramēt be consecrate or vnconsecrate (for though he moste specyallye speaketh of the wyne, yet he speaketh it of both) and byddeth not care, but to take it for all that vnblessed as it is, because the Preste (he sayeth) can not deceyue vs nor take from vs the profyte of Christes instytucyon, whether he alter the wordes or leaue them all vnsayde. Is not thys a wonderfull doctryne of thys yonge man. We knowe well all, that the Preste can not hurte vs by hys oversyght or malyce, yf there be no faulte vpō our owne partye, for that perfectyon that lacketh vpon the Prestes parte, the great mercye of God as we truste of hys owne goodnes supplyeth it. And therfore as holye Chrisostome sayeth, no man can take harme but of hymselfe. But now yf we see the thynge dysordered our owne selfe, by the Preste, and Christes instytucyon broken, yf we than wetynglye receyue it vnblessed and vnconsecrated, and care not whether Christes instytucyon be kepte and observed or no, but reaken it is as good wythout it as with it, then make we our selfes partakers of the faulte and lose the profyte of the sacrament, and receyue it with dampnacyon: not for the Prestes faulte, but for our owne.