Medicine -- Anecdotes; Physicians -- Great Britain
These were only a few of the noble and distinguished dupes of Joanna
Stephens. Mrs. Crowe, in her profound and philosophic work,
"Spiritualism, and the Age we live in," informs us that "the
solicitude" about the subject of table-turning "displayed by many
persons in high places, is the best possible sign of the times; and it
is one from which she herself hopes that the period is arrived when we
shall receive further help from God." Hadn't Joanna Stephens reason to
think that the period had arrived when she and her remedial system
would receive further help from God? What would not Read (we do not
mean the empiric oculist knighted by Queen Anne, but the cancer quack
of our own time) give to have such a list of aristocratic supporters?
What would not Mrs. Doctor Goss (who in this year, 1861, boasts of the
patronage of "ladies of the highest distinction") give for a similar
roll of adherents?
The agitation, however, for a public subscription for Joanna Stephens
was not so successful as her patrician supporters anticipated. They
succeeded in collecting £1356 3_s._ But Joanna stood out: her secret
should not go for less than £5000. "No pay, no cure!" was her cry. The
next thing her friends did was to apply to Parliament for the
required sum--and, positively, their request was granted. The nation,
out of its taxes, paid what the individuals of its wealthy classes
refused to subscribe. A commission was appointed by Parliament, that
gravely inquired into the particulars of the cures alleged to be
performed by Joanna Stephens; and, finding the evidence in favour of
the lady unexceptionable, they awarded her the following certificate,
which ought to be preserved to all ages as a valuable example of
senatorial wisdom:--
"THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE ACT OF
PARLIAMENT.
March 5, 1739.
"We, whose names are underwritten, being the major part of
the Justices appointed by an Act of Parliament, entitled,
'_An Act for providing a Reward to Joanna Stephens, upon
proper discovery to be made by her, for the use of the
Publick, of the Medicines prepared by her_-- --' --do
certify, that the said Joanna Stephens did, with all
convenient speed after the passing of the said Act, make a
discovery to our satisfaction, for the use of the publick,
of the said medicines, and of her method of preparing the
same; and that we have examined the said medicines, and of
her method of preparing of the same, and are convinced by
experiment of the _Utility_, _Efficacy_, and _Dissolving
Power_ thereof.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account