During the building of this pretty structure an unsuccessful attempt
was made to ground the piers while eleven men baled water from the
river. Then a dam was built, and trenches were dug to prevent the
water from overflowing the dam. This I gather from the ballad, but
the wording is not at all graphic in any technical matter.[106] We
are not told why cofferdams[107] were not tried. In the Middle Ages
cofferdams were known as brandryths or brandereths; by this name they
are mentioned in the Contract Deed for the building of Catterick
Bridge over the Swale, A.D. 1421; and they were large enough to
obstruct most rivers, for they had to surround enormous piers, and
the thickness of their sides was never less than from four to six
feet. It is interesting to note, in this connection, that during the
construction of Old London Bridge, between 1176 and 1209, the Thames
“was turned another way about by a trench,” which, according to Stow,
began east near “Rotherhithe, as is supposed, and ended in the west
about Patricksey, now termed Battersea.” In those days no embankments
controlled the Thames at London; wide shores, littered with the odds
and ends of a waterside life, were playgrounds for the ebb and flow of
the tidal waters; and the main purpose of the “trench” or canal was
to lessen the risk of floods while the huge piers were being founded.
Stow’s words give us to understand that _all_ the water in the
Thames “was turned another way about”; a very important feat of civil
engineering. Perhaps the purpose of the canal was not so thorough;
perhaps it drew from the river sufficient water to lower its normal
level by several feet and to diminish the force of the tidal current.
In any case, however, Stow’s evidence has great interest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account