In 1815, when Rennie began his bridge over the Thames at Southwark,
neither the Government nor the City of London employed him; it was a
Company that approved his designs, and financed the undertaking. At an
expense of £800,000, three bad arches of cast-iron were put up from
“elegant” stone piers and abutments; yet London was charmed by “a
great feat of engineering,” partly because 5780 tons of ironwork had
been employed, and partly because the central arch had a span of 240
ft. From 1819 to November 8, 1864, the Company was a toll gatherer on
their industrial bridge; then the toll was done away with, and the
Company received from the City an industrial compensation. Here is
a financial adventure which might have been undertaken to benefit a
small township which had in its neighbourhood some new ironworks and
collieries. Still more farcical was the public lottery that helped to
collect money for the building of the first Westminster Bridge, between
1738 and 1750. Even now, after many lessons from past follies, London
has made more than one muddle over the project of St. Paul’s Bridge.
Not even the Tower Bridge, with all its blatant defects, has enabled
the City to be alert and clever as a pontist.
A more absurd structure than the Tower Bridge was never thrown across
a strategic river. What would be the use of those ornate towers if the
suspended roadway connecting them to the banksides were cut by a shell
or by a falling bomb? And what anachronism could be sillier than that
which has united the principle of metal suspension to an architecture
cribbed partly from the Middle Ages, and partly from the French
Renaissance? The many small windows, the peaked roofing, the absurdly
impudent little turrets, the biscuit-like aspect of the meretricious
masonry, the desperate effort to be “artistic” at any cost: all this,
you know, is at standing odds with the contemporary parts of the
unhistoric bridge, parts huge in scale, but so commercial that there is
not a vestige of military forethought anywhere. It is mere perishable
bulk.
[Illustration: THE TOWER BRIDGE, LONDON]
FOOTNOTES:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account