Soon afterwards, in a great cast-iron arch thrown over the Spey,
Telford made new experiments, and, as Professor Fleeming Jenkin has
said, his bridge at Craigellachie marked “a great advance in the
conception of what was the safest form in which to apply cast-iron to
an arch.” But more than this was expected from an engineer of Telford’s
reputation, and nothing more came from him, unfortunately. In fact,
Telford divorced his work from the good sense of good design, which
Darby and Burdon had endeavoured to respect. At each abutment he put
up a silly tower pierced with arrow-slits and armed with battlements,
advertising a farce of warlike make-believe which scores of foolish
engineers would copy and adapt, while leaving their bridges entirely
unfortified.
A bridge here and there is supposed to be all right. Take, for
instance, the Forth Bridge, with his 51,000 tons of steel, and his
amazing cost, about £3,000,000; he is looked upon as a “safe” bridge,
and safe he is if we forget what bombs and shells can do in a few
seconds. At each end of this bridge the railway is carried by trivial
columns forming the approach viaducts, and these a naval gun would blow
to smithereens. A bomb falling upon them from an airship might put the
whole bridge out of action. Further, the columns are comically out of
scale with those gigantic pyramids of steel bars which counterbalance
the centre girders, and yet seem to play at leapfrog in two bounds of
1710 ft. each, and in two lesser jumps of 680 ft. each. Yes, the Forth
Bridge looks formidably alive and active; he is to modern engineering
what the Ichthyosaurus became to our knowledge of prehistoric animals:
a semi-marine colossus, fit to be kept for ever as a tremendous danger
happily extinct.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account