One of the most famous Norman bridges in Old England was the one
that crossed the Lea at Stratford-at-Bow. It was founded and endowed
by Queen Mathilda, wife of Henry I. In 1831, eight years before its
demolition, a print was issued of Bow Bridge, and ribs can be seen
under two of the three arches. The central arch is represented in a
direct front view, so the vaulting cannot be studied; but Lewis, who in
1831 published his “Topographical Dictionary of England,” found ribs
in the three arches. So a very important question arises here: Was Bow
Bridge ever rebuilt? M. J. J. Jusserand shall answer this question; he
has read all the evidence, he makes no reference to ribbed arches, he
is unbiassed, and his pictures are lively:--
“Whether Queen Mathilda (twelfth century) got wetted or not,
as is supposed, on passing the ford of the river at
Stratford-atte-Bow--that same village where afterwards the
French was spoken which amused Chaucer--it is certain that
she thought she did a meritorious work in constructing two
bridges there. Several times repaired, Bow Bridge was still
standing in 1839. The Queen endowed her foundation, granting
land and a water-mill to the Abbess of Barking with a
perpetual charge thereon for the maintenance of the bridge
and the neighbouring roadway. When the Queen died, an abbey
for men was founded at the same Stratford close to the
bridges, and the Abbess hastened to transfer to the new
monastery the property in the mill and the charge of the
reparations. The Abbot did them at first, then he wearied of
it, and ended by delegating the looking after them to one
Godfrey Pratt. He had built this man a house on the causeway
beside the bridge, and made him a yearly grant. For a long
time Pratt carried out the contract, ‘getting assistance,’
says an inquiry of Edward I (1272-1307), ‘from some
passers-by, but without often having recourse to their aid.’
Also he received the charity of travellers, and his affairs
prospered. They prospered so well that the Abbot thought he
might withdraw the pension; Pratt indemnified himself in the
best way he could. He set up iron bars across the bridge and
made all pay who passed over,[31] except the rich, for he
made prudent exception ‘for the nobility; he feared them and
let them pass without molesting them.’ The dispute
terminated only in the time of Edward II, when the Abbot
recognised his fault, took back the charge of the bridge,
and put down the iron bars, the toll, and Godfrey Pratt
himself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account