“This bridge, over which no doubt Chaucer himself passed,
was of stone, the arches were narrow and the piers thick;
strong angular buttresses supported them and broke the force
of the current; these formed at the upper part a triangle or
siding which served as a refuge for foot-passengers, for the
roadway was so narrow that a carriage sufficed to fill the
way. When it was pulled down in 1839, it was found that the
method of construction had been very simple. To ground the
piers in the bed of the river the masons had simply thrown
down stones and mortar till the level of the water had been
reached. It was remarked also that the ill-will of Pratt or
the Abbot or of their successors must have rendered the
bridge almost as dangerous at certain moments as the
primitive ford had been. The wheels of vehicles had hollowed
such deep ruts in the stone and the horses’ shoes had so
worn the pavement that an arch had been at one time pierced
through.”[32]
This perforated arch proves pretty conclusively that Bow Bridge was
never rebuilt; but I look upon doubt as an excellent thing in one’s
attitude to matters of this kind, partly because fresh evidence may be
discovered, and partly because facts are woefully elusive even when
they are tackled by judges, and barristers, and juries.
There is one more controversy to be considered: it centres around the
famous bridges on Dartmoor, and I will try to put all the main points
both clearly and fairly. In this dispute architects contend against
antiquaries, and their arguments hold the field. Let me sum them up:--
The “clapper” bridges over Dartmoor rivers are not difficult to study;
their construction resembles that of cromlechs and Stonehenges. Their
piers were evolved from menhirs, and their table slabs from the mass of
rock forming the horizontal member of a cromlech. Nor is it difficult
to suggest the evolution through which the clapper bridges have passed,
for on Dartmoor itself the evolution is plainly suggested by the rude
bridge at Okery and by the single slab at Walla Brook. Any primitive
farmer of the Bronze Age had sense enough not merely to put a ledge
of granite across the Walla Brook, but to span wider rivers by using
menhirs to support large blocks of granite. Timber would not be used,
since trees were very scarce on Dartmoor, while granite was so abundant
that it must have been very troublesome to farmers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account