A Brief History of the Worshipful Company of Ironmongers, London A.D. 1351-1889: With an Appendix Containing Some Account of the Blacksmiths' CompanyNoble, T. C. (Theophilus Charles)
History
A Brief History of the Worshipful Company of Ironmongers, London A.D. 1351-1889: With an Appendix Containing Some Account of the Blacksmiths' Company
Noble, T. C. (Theophilus Charles)
Worshipful Company of Ironmongers (London, England) -- History
The art of working in metals was more highly esteemed than
any other by the Anglo-Saxons. Their best artisans were the
clergy. Edgar established a law that every priest, to increase
knowledge, should diligently learn some handicraft. Dunstan,
Archbishop of Canterbury, to the arts of music, engraving,
painting, and writing, added the craft of a smith, and was
an expert workman. Stigand and Ethelwold, both bishops,
were celebrated for their mechanical skill. The chief smith
was a man of considerable distinction in the courts of the
Anglo-Saxon kings and his privileges and weregild exceeded
those of any other craftsman. Towards the period of the
Conquest the manufacture of iron had considerably increased,
and the art of working it was better understood. Steel and
iron armour were common. At the time of the Domesday Survey
the City of Hereford had six smiths, who paid each one penny
for his forge, and made 120 pieces of iron from the king’s
ore, receiving in return a customary payment of three pence,
and being free from all other service. The City of Gloucester
paid to the king 36 dicras of iron and 100 ductile rods to make
nails for the king’s ships. Iron had now become the principal
manufacture of Gloucestershire, and in the reign of Edward I.
there is stated to have been no less than 72 furnaces in the
Forest of Dean for smelting it. The largest establishments
of the Romans for the manufacture of iron in Britain were in
this county, but the method, whatever it may have been, which
they employed was imperfect and the cinders of their numerous
forges, wherever they are discovered, are found to contain
a very considerable portion of unsmelted metal. The first
smelting-furnace, and that which in all probability was used
by the Romans for the manufacture of iron, is supposed to be
the air-bloomery; it is described as a low conical structure,
with small openings at the bottom for the admission of air
and a large orifice at top for carrying off the gaseous
products of combustion. It was filled with charcoal and ore
in alternate layers, and the fire applied to the lowest part.
How long this simple contrivance continued in use we have no
means of ascertaining, the period to which it belongs being so
very remote; there is no doubt, however, that the next era of
improvement in the manufacture of iron was the introduction
of bellows, and the construction of the blast-bloomery, which
greatly facilitated the process of smelting, and, by allowing
the construction of larger furnaces, considerably increased
the manufacture. The blast-bloomery, in process of time and
the constant progression of the arts, was superseded by what
is denominated the blast-furnace. This last improvement is
supposed to have been introduced during the early part of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account