Among the most curious of ancient Egyptian documents are the two
papyri, the Abbott and the Amherst, which tell the story of the
robberies of the royal tombs at Thebes, which came to light in the
reign of Ramses IX, about 1100 B.C. At that time the capital city was
ruled, under the Governor, by a certain noble named Paser, who was
called “The Prince of the Town.” Western Thebes, however, the City
of the Dead, was not under the care of Paser, but was supervised by
another official named Pewero, who rejoiced in the title of “Prince
of the West.” Between the Prince of the Town and the Prince of the
West there was no love lost, as is not uncommon with the heads of two
adjacent jurisdictions; and Paser, on the eastern bank of the river,
kept his ears open to all the tittle-tattle of discontented workmen
from the Necropolis which drifted across the river. It so fell out
in the sixteenth year of Ramses IX, that certain thefts from the
Necropolis were reported by the Prince of the West to the Governor;
and Paser seized the opportunity of making the most to the Council
of the laxity of administration which allowed such things, and of
suggesting that infinitely worse robberies, involving the Royal Tombs,
were occurring under his enemy’s jurisdiction.
[Illustration: 17. LUXOR, PAPYRUS-BUD COLUMNS AND COLOSSI OF RAMSES II.]
A special commission was appointed to investigate the charges, and
the importance of the case is shown by the rank of the members of the
court. These were Khaemuas, the Governor, “The Royal Vassal Nesamen,
Scribe of Pharaoh,” _i.e._ the King’s private Secretary, and “The Royal
Vassal Neferkara-em-per-Amen, the Speaker of Pharaoh,” doubtless the
King’s Public Orator. This august court went at great length into the
charges, and it is impossible to read the account of the case without
feeling that Paser had right on his side, though he rather made a
bungle of his case. Obviously his information was mainly derived from
ill-natured gossip, for it was so inaccurate in detail that the very
royal tomb which he positively declared to have been robbed was found
on examination to be untouched; but equally obviously there was a great
deal going on in the Necropolis which should not have gone on, and
Pewero either connived at the thefts or was culpably careless.
On the whole Paser failed to establish his charges, though in one case,
to be mentioned directly, there was plain evidence of the violation of
a royal tomb. The Prince of the Town took his failure rather badly, and
spoke wild whirling words before a riotous deputation of Necropolis
workmen, which got him into trouble; but bit by bit the actual truth
leaked out, though not in the Commission.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account