A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
universal.
_Glacial Sculpture._
Within the present generation sculpture by glaciers has received much
attention and has involved a reconsideration of the ability of ice to
erode which in turn involves a crystallization of views of the mechanics
of moving ice. The evidence for glacier erosion has remained largely
physiographic and rests on a study of land forms. In fact, the
inadequacy of structural features or of river corrasion to account for
flat-floored, steep-walled gorges, hanging valleys, and many lake
basins, rather than a knowledge of the mechanics of ice has led to the
present fairly general belief that glaciers are powerful agents of rock
sculpture. The details of the process are not yet understood.
Erosion by glaciers enters the arena of active discussion in 1862–63.
The possibility had been suggested by Esmark (1827) and by Dana (1849)
in the description of fiords and by Hind (1855) with reference to the
origin of the Great Lakes. It appears full-fledged in Ramsay’s classic,
which was published simultaneously in England and in America.[72] The
argument runs as follows: There is a close association of ancient
glaciers and lakes especially in mountains; glaciers are amply able to
erode; evidences of faulting, special subsidence, river erosion, and
marine erosion are absent from the lake basins of Switzerland and Great
Britain. To quote Ramsay:
“It required a solid body grinding steadily and powerfully in direct
and heavy contact with and across the rocks to scoop out deep hollows,
the situations of which might either be determined by unequal hardness
of the rocks, by extra weight of ice in special places, or by
accidental circumstances, the clue to which is lost from our inability
perfectly to reconstruct the original forms of the glaciers.”
“I believe with the Italian geologists, that all that the glaciers as
a whole effected was only slightly to deepen these valleys and
materially to modify their general outlines, and, further (a theory I
am alone responsible for), to deepen them in parts more considerably
when, from various causes, the grinding power of the ice was unusually
powerful, especially where, as in the lowlands of Switzerland, the
Miocene strata are comparatively soft.”
Whittlesey (1864)[73] considered that the rock-bound lakes and narrow
bays near Lake Superior were partly excavated by ice. LeConte (1875)[74]
records some significant observations in a pioneer paper on glacier
erosion which has not received adequate recognition. He says:
“... I am convinced that a glacier, by its enormous pressure and
resistless onward movement, is _constantly breaking off large blocks_
from its bed and bounding walls. Its erosion is not only a grinding
and scoring, but also a _crushing and breaking_. It makes by its
erosion not only rock-meal, but also large _rock-chips_.... Its
erosion is a constant process of alternate _rough hewing_ and
_planing_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account