A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
In the present essay on the rise of structural geology as reflected
through a century of publication in the Journal, attention will be given
especially to two fields, that of structures connected with igneous
rocks and that of structures connected with mountain making, and
emphasis will be placed upon the growth of understanding rather than
upon the accumulating knowledge of details. The growth in both of these
divisions of structural geology is well illustrated in the volumes of
the Journal.
_Structures and Relationships of Igneous Rocks._
_Opposed Interpretations of Plutonists and Neptunists._
During the first quarter of the nineteenth century the geologic
controversy between the Plutonists and Neptunists was at its height; the
Plutonists, following the Scotchman, Hutton, holding to the igneous
origin of basalt and granite, the Neptunists, after their German master,
Werner of Freiberg, maintaining that these rocks had been precipitated
from a primitive universal ocean. The Plutonists, although time has
shown them to have been correct in all essential particulars, were for a
generation submerged under the propaganda carried forward by the
disciples of Werner. The “Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory of the
Earth,” a remarkable classic, worthy of being studied to-day as well as
a century ago, was published in 1802 by John Playfair, professor of
mathematics in the University of Edinburgh and a friend of Hutton, who
had died five years previously. This volume was opposed by Robert
Jameson, professor of natural philosophy in the same university, who had
absorbed the ideas of the German school while at Freiberg and published
in 1808 a volume on the “Elements of Geognosy,” in which the philosophy
of Werner is followed throughout and even obsidian and pumice are argued
to be aqueous precipitates. The authority of the Wernerian autocracy
caused its nomenclature to be adopted in the new world, but strong
evidence against its interpretations was to be found in the actual
structural relations displayed by the igneous rocks.
_Contributions on Volcanic and Intrusive Rocks._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account