A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
The geosynclinal ranges or synclinoria have experienced in almost all
cases, since their completion, true elevation through great
geanticlinal movements, but movements that embraced a wider range of
crust than that concerned in the preceding geosynclinal movements,
indeed a range of crust that comes strictly under the designation of a
polygenetic mass.”
“_The Condition of the Earth’s Interior._”
“The condition of the earth’s interior is not among the geological
results of contraction from cooling. But these results offer an
argument of great weight respecting the earth’s interior condition,
and make it desirable that the subject should be discussed in this
connection. Moreover, the facts throw additional light on the
preceding topic—the origin of mountains.
It seems now to be demonstrated by astronomical and physical
arguments—arguments that are independent, it should be noted, of
direct geological observation—that the interior of our globe is
essentially solid. But the great oscillations of the earth’s surface,
which have seemed to demand for explanation a liquid interior, still
remain facts, and present apparently a greater difficulty than ever to
the geologist. Professor Le Conte’s views, in volume iv, were offered
by him as a method of meeting this difficulty; yet, as he admits in
his concluding remarks, the oscillations over the interior of a
continent, and the fact of the greater movements on the borders of the
larger ocean, were left by him unexplained. Yet these oscillations are
not more real than the changes of level or greater oscillations which
occurred along the sea border, where mountains were the final result;
and this being a demonstrated truth, no less than the general solidity
of the earth’s interior, the question comes up, how are the two truths
compatible?
The geological argument on the subject (the only one within our
present purpose) has often been presented. But it derives new force
and gives clearer revelations when the facts are viewed in the light
of the principles that have been explained in the preceding part of
this memoir.
The Appalachian subsidence in the Alleghany region of 35,000 to 40,000
feet, going on through all the Paleozoic era, was due, as has been
shown, to an actual sinking of the earth’s crust through lateral
pressure, and not to local contraction in the strata themselves or the
terranes underneath. But such a subsidence is not possible, unless
seven miles—that is, seven miles in maximum depth and over a hundred
in total breadth—unless seven miles of _something_ were removed, in
its progress, from the region beneath.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account