A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
Thus far no mention has been made of German geologists, with the
exception of Suess, an Austrian. German geology is voluminous and the
names of many well-known geologists could be cited. But this article has
sought to trace the origin and growth of fundamental ideas. The Germans
have been assiduous observers of detail; preeminent as systematizers and
classifiers, seldom originators. Even petrology, which might be regarded
as their especial field, was transplanted from Great Britain. In the
science of mountains they have followed in their fundamental ideas
especially the French.
Turning to the mediums of publication through which this progress of
knowledge in earth structures has been recorded, the American Journal of
Science stands foremost as the only continuous record for the whole
century in American literature, fulfilling for this country what the
Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society has done for Great Britain
since 1845, and the Bulletin de la Société Géologique for France since
1830.
_Notes._
Footnote 78:
H. D. Rogers, Geology of New Jersey, Final Report, p. 115, 1840.
Footnote 79:
H. D. Rogers, Geology of Pennsylvania, vol. 2, pt. II, pp. 761, 762,
1858.
Footnote 80:
Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1810; quoted by G. P.
Merrill in Contributions to the History of North American geology,
Ann. Rpt. Smithsonian Institution for 1904, p. 216.
Footnote 81:
A Sketch of the geology, mineralogy, and scenery of the regions
contiguous to the river Connecticut; with a geological map and
drawings of organic remains; and occasional botanical notices, the
Journal, 6, 1–86, 201–236, 1823; 7, 1–30, 1824.
Footnote 82:
Clarence King, U. S. Geol. Exploration of the Fortieth Parallel, vol.
1, pp. 16, 44–48, 1878.
Footnote 83:
Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory of the Earth, pp. 219–238, 1802.
Footnote 84:
Robert Jameson, Elements of Geognosy, pp. 55–57, 1808.
Footnote 85:
G. P. Merrill, Contributions to the History of American Geology.
Report of the U. S. National Museum for 1904, p. 328.
Footnote 86:
H. D. Rogers, Geology of Pennsylvania, vol. 2, p. 916, 1858.
Footnote 87:
James Hall, Natural History of New York, Paleontology, vol. 3, pp.
51–73, 1859.
Footnote 88:
The Journal, 5, 423–443, 474, 475; 6, 6–14, 104–115, 161–172, 304,
381, 382, 1873.
Footnote 89:
C. R. Van Hise, Principles of North American Pre-Cambrian Geology, U.
S. Geol. Surv., 16th Ann. Report, pt. I, pp. 607–612, 1896.
Footnote 90:
W. N. Rice, On the use of the words synclinorium and anticlinorium,
Science, 23, 286, 287, 1906.
Footnote 91:
C. E. Dutton, Critical observations on theories of the earth’s
physical evolution, The Penn Monthly, May and June, 1876.
Footnote 92:
B. Willis, Research in China, vol. 2, 1907.
Footnote 93:
Joseph Barrell, Science, 39, 259, 260, 1909; Jour. Geol., 22, 672–683,
1914.
Footnote 94:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account