A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
By 1878, when the Fortieth Parallel Survey had completed the work
planned by its chief, three of these independent surveys still contended
for Federal support and for scientific occupation of the most attractive
portions of the Western country. Unrestrained competition of this kind,
even in the public service, proves as wasteful as unregulated
competition in private business,[103] and Congress appealed to the
National Academy of Sciences for a plan for Government surveys to
“secure the best results at the least possible cost.” Under instructions
by Congress the National Academy considered all the work relating to
scientific surveys and reported to Congress a plan prepared by a special
committee, whose membership included the illustrious names of Marsh,
Dana, Rogers, Newberry, Trowbridge, Newcomb, and Agassiz. This report,
which was adopted by the Academy with only one dissenting vote, grouped
all surveys—geodetic, topographic, land parceling, and economic—under
two distinct heads, surveys of mensuration and surveys of geology. At
that time five independent organizations in three different departments
were carrying on surveys of mensuration, and the Academy recommended
that all such work be combined under the Coast and Geodetic Survey with
the new name Coast and Interior Survey. For the investigation of the
natural resources of the public domain and the classification of the
public lands a new organization was proposed, the United States
Geological Survey. The functions of these two surveys and of a third
coordinate bureau in the Interior Department, the Land Office, were
carefully defined and their interrelations fully recognized and provided
for in the plan presented to Congress. Viewed in the light of 39 years
of experience the National Academy plan would be indorsed by most of us
as eminently practical, and the report stands as a splendid example of
public service rendered by America’s leading scientists. The legislation
which embodied the entire plan, however, failed of passage in Congress.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account