A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
To those who had been nurtured in the belief in a relatively recent
creation covering in its entirety a period of but six days, and
occurring but four millenniums before the time of Christ, the appearance
of the remains of creatures in the rocks, the like of which no man ever
saw alive, must have given scope to the wildest imaginings concerning
their origin and significance; for many believed that not only had no
new forms been added to the world’s fauna since the creation, except
possibly by hybridizing, but that none had become extinct save a very
few through the agency of human interference. The supposition was,
therefore, that such creatures as were thus discovered were still extant
in some more remote fastnesses of the world. Thus, our second president,
Thomas Jefferson, who wrote one of the first papers on American fossil
vertebrates, published in 1798, discussed therein the remains of a huge
ground-sloth which has since borne the name _Megalonyx jeffersoni_.
Jefferson, however, described the great claws as pertaining to a huge
leonine animal which he firmly believed was yet living among the
mountains of Virginia.
Cuvier (1769–1832) has been spoken of as the founder of our science. His
opportunity lay in the profusion of bones buried in the gypsum deposits
of Montmartre within the environs of the city of Paris. Cuvier’s studies
of these remains, done in the light of his very broad anatomical
knowledge, enabled him to prepare the first reconstructions of fossil
vertebrates ever attempted and to bring before the eyes of his
contemporaries a world peopled with forms which were utterly extinct.
That these creatures were no longer living, none was a better judge than
Cuvier, for his prominence was such that material was sent him from all
parts of the world, to which must be added that which he saw in his
visits to the various museums of Europe. He felt it safe, therefore, to
affirm the unlikelihood of any further discovery of unknown forms among
the great mammals of the present fauna of our globe, and few indeed have
been the additions since his day. To Cuvier is due not alone the
masterly contribution to the sister sciences of comparative anatomy and
vertebrate paleontology—the Ossements Fossiles (1812)—but he also
announced the presence in continental strata of a series of faunas which
showed a gradual organic improvement from the earliest such assemblage
to the most modern, an idea of the most fundamental importance and one
with which he is rarely credited. He believed in the sudden and complete
extinction of faunas, and the facts then known were in accord with this
idea, as no common genera nor transitional forms connected the creatures
of the Paris gypsum with the mastodons, elephants, and hippopotami which
the later strata disclosed. It is not remarkable, therefore, that Cuvier
advanced his theory of catastrophism to account for these extinctions.
He should not, however, according to Depéret, be credited with the idea
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account