A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
Although, as has been shown, the beginnings of mineralogy lie in the
remote past, the science, as we know it to-day, can be said to have had
practically its whole growth during the last one hundred years. Of the
more than one thousand mineral species that may now be considered as
definitely established hardly more than two hundred were known in the
year 1800 and these were only partially described or understood. It is
true that Haüy, the “father of crystallography,” had before this date
discovered and formulated the laws of crystal symmetry, and had shown
that rational relations existed between the intercepts upon the axes of
the different faces of a crystal. It was not until 1809, however, that
Wollaston described the first form of a reflecting goniometer, and thus
made possible the beginning of exact investigation of crystals. The
distinctions between the different crystal groups were developed by
Bernhardi, Weiss and Mohs between the years 1807 and 1820, while the
Naumann system of crystal symbols was not proposed until 1826. The fact
that doubly refracting minerals also polarize light was discovered by
Malus in 1808, and in 1813 Brewster first recognized the optical
differences between uniaxial and biaxial minerals. The modern science of
chemistry was also just beginning to develop at this period, enabling
mineralogists to make analyses more and more accurately and thus by
chemical means to establish the true character of minerals, and to
properly classify them.
Franz von Kobell, on page 372 of his “Geschichte der Mineralogie,”
somewhat poetically describes the condition of the science at this
period as follows: “With the end of the eighteenth and the commencement
of the nineteenth centuries exact investigations in mineralogy first
began. The mineralogist was no longer content with approximate
descriptions of minerals, but strove rather to separate the essential
facts from those that were accidental, to discover definite laws, and to
learn the relations between the physical and chemical characters of a
mineral. The use of mathematics gave a new aspect to crystallography,
and the development of the optical relationships opened a magnificent
field of wonderful phenomena which can be described as a garden gay with
flowers of light, charming in themselves and interesting in their
relations to the forces which guide and govern the regular structure of
matter.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account