A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
A few years later Ampère showed how to express quantitatively the force
between current elements, and indeed developed to a considerable degree
the equivalence between a closed circuit carrying a current and a
magnetic shell. So convincing was his analysis and so thorough his
discussion of the subject, that Maxwell said of this memoir half a
century later, “The whole, theory and experiment, seems as if it had
leaped, full grown and full armed, from the brain of the ‘Newton of
electricity.’ It is perfect in form and unassailable in accuracy; and it
is summed up in a formula from which all the phenomena may be deduced,
and which must always remain the cardinal formula of electrodynamics.”
Shortly afterwards the dependence of a current on the conductivity of
the wire used and the grouping of cells employed, was made clear by the
work of Ohm. Many of his results were obtained independently by Joseph
Henry (=19=, 400, 1831) of the Albany Academy, who described in 1831 a
powerful electromagnet in which a great many coils of wire insulated
with silk were wound around an iron core and connected in parallel with
a single cell. He remarks in this paper that with long wires, as in the
telegraph, many cells arranged in series should be used, whereas for
several short wires connected in parallel a single cell with large
plates is more efficient.
_Current Induction._—Impressed by the fact that electric charges have
the power of inducing other charges on neighboring conductors without
coming into contact with them, Faraday was engaged in investigating the
possibility of an analogous phenomenon in the case of electric currents.
His idea at first seems to have been that a current should induce
another current in any closed conducting circuit which happens to be in
its vicinity. Experiment readily showed the falsity of this conception,
but a brief deflection of the galvanometer in the secondary circuit was
noticed at the instant of making and breaking the current in the
primary. Further experiments showed that thrusting a permanent steel
magnet into a coil connected to a galvanometer caused the needle to
deflect. In fact Faraday’s report to the Royal Society on November 24th,
1831, contains a complete account of all experimental methods available
for inducing a current in a closed circuit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account