A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
Hooker took up a study of the flora of Tasmania, of which the above
cited article is but a chapter, with a view to trying out Darwin’s
theory, and he now accepts it. He says, “Species are derivative and
mutable.” “The limits of the majority of species are so undefinable that
few naturalists are agreed upon them.”
Asa Gray had received from Darwin an advance copy of the book that was
to revolutionize the thought of the world, and at once wrote for the
Journal a Review of Darwin’s Theory on the Origin of Species by means of
Natural Selection (=29=, 153, 1860). This is a splendid, critical but
just, scientific review of Darwin’s epoch-making book. Evidently views
similar to those, of the English scientist had long been in the mind of
Gray, for he easily and quickly mastered the work. He is easy on Dana’s
Thoughts on Species, which were idealistic and not in harmony with the
naturalistic views of Darwin. On the other hand, he contrasts Darwin’s
views at length with those of the creationists as exemplified by Louis
Agassiz, and says “The widest divergence appears.”
Gray says in part:
“The gist of Mr. Darwin’s work is to show that such varieties are
gradually diverged into species and genera through natural selection;
that natural selection is the inevitable result of the struggle for
existence which all living things are engaged in; and that this
struggle is an unavoidable consequence of several natural causes, but
mainly of the high rate at which all organic beings tend to increase.
Darwin is confident that intermediate forms must have existed; that in
the olden times when the genera, the families and the orders diverged
from their parent stocks, gradations existed as fine as those which
now connect closely related species with varieties. But they have
passed and left no sign. The geological record, even if all displayed
to view, is a book from which not only many pages, but even whole
alternate chapters have been lost out, or rather which were never
printed from the autographs of nature. The record was actually made in
fossil lithography only at certain times and under certain conditions
(i.e., at periods of slow subsidence and places of abundant sediment);
and of these records all but the last volume is out of print; and of
its pages only local glimpses have been obtained. Geologists, except
Lyell, will object to this,—some of them moderately, others with
vehemence. Mr. Darwin himself admits, with a candor rarely displayed
on such occasions, that he should have expected more geological
evidence of transition than he finds, and that all the most eminent
paleontologists maintain the immutability of species.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account