A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
History
A century of science in America : $b with special reference to the American Journal of Science, 1818-1918
American journal of science; Science -- United States -- History
“The dominant idea of the first sixteen centuries of the present era
was, that the universe was made for Man. This was the great obstacle
to the correct determination of the position of the earth in the
universe, and, later, of the age of the earth.... In a superstitious
age, when every natural event is referred to a supernatural cause,
science cannot live.... Scarcely less fatal to the growth of science
is the age of Authority, as the past proves too well. With freedom of
thought, came definite knowledge, and certain progress;—but two
thousand years was long to wait.”
One of the most significant publications of this period was Linnæus’s
Systema Naturæ, which appeared in 1735. In this work was introduced
binomial nomenclature, or the system of giving each plant and animal
species a generic and specific name, as _Felis leo_ for the lion. The
system was, however, not established until the tenth edition of the work
in 1758, which became the starting point of zoological nomenclature.
Since then there has been added another canon, the law of priority,
which holds that the first name applied to a given form shall stand
against all later names given to the same organism.
_Catastrophic Period._—With the beginning of the nineteenth century
there started a new era in paleontology, and this was the time when the
foundations of the science were laid. The period continued for six
decades, or until the time of the Origin of Species. Marsh says that now
“method replaced disorder, and systematic study superseded casual
observation.” Fossils were accurately determined, comparisons were made
with living forms, and the species named according to the binomial
system. However, every species, recent and extinct, was regarded as a
separate creation, and because of the usually sharp separation of the
superposed fossil faunas and floras, these were held to have been
destroyed through a series of periodic catastrophes of which the
Noachian deluge was the last.
Lamarck between 1802 and 1806 described the Tertiary shells of the Paris
basin. Comparing them with the living forms, he saw that most of the
fossils were of extinct species, and in this way he came to be the
founder of modern invertebrate paleontology. He also maintained after
1801 that life has been continuous since its origin and that nature has
been uniform in the course of its development. Marsh adds:
“His researches on the invertebrate fossils of the Paris Basin,
although less striking, were not less important than those of Cuvier
on the vertebrates; while the conclusions he derived from them form
the basis of modern biology.”
“Lamarck was the prophetic genius, half a century in advance of his
time.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account