All these poor devils, all these poor wretches, male and female,
forgetting their own social irregularities, showed a strangely
implacable severity toward persons whom it was allowable to suspect,
not even of stains or blemishes, but simply of some formal lack of
respect for society laws,--the only ones that ought to be obeyed.
Living, in a certain sense, outside of their social ideal, thrown
back, so to speak, to the margin of that existence whose disgraced
correctness and regularity they honored as a religion, they undoubtedly
hoped to get into it again by driving out others. The comicality of
this was really intense and savory. They divided the universe into two
great parts: on the one side, that which is regular; on the other,
that which is not; here the people that one may receive; there the
people that one may not receive. And these two great parts soon became
pieces, and the pieces became thin slices, the subdivision going on
_ad infinitum_. There were those in whose houses one may dine, and
also those to whose houses one may go only for the evening. Those in
whose houses one may not dine, but to which one may go for the evening.
Those whom one may receive at his table, and those to whom one may
accord only admission to his _salon_,--and even then only under certain
circumstances, clearly defined. There were also those in whose houses
one may not dine and whom one should not receive at one's house, and
those whom one may receive at one's house and in whose houses one may
not dine; those whom one may receive at breakfast, and never at dinner;
and those in whose country houses one may dine, but never in their
Paris residences, etc. The whole being supported with demonstrative
and peremptory examples, well-known names being cited by way of
illustration.
"Shades," said the Viscount Lahyrais, sportsman, clubman, gambler, and
trickster. "The whole thing lies there. It is by the strict observance
of shades that a man is really in society, or is not."
I believe that I never heard such dreary things. As I listened to them,
I really felt a pity for these unfortunates.
Charrigaud neither ate or drank, and said nothing. Although he was
scarcely in the conversation, he nevertheless felt its enormous and
forbidding stupidity like a weight upon his skull. Impatient, feverish,
very pale, he watched the service, tried to catch favorable or ironical
impressions of the faces of his guests, and mechanically, with
movements more and more accelerated, and in spite of the warnings of
his wife, rolled big pellets of bread-crumb between his fingers. When
a question was put to him, he answered in a bewildered, distracted,
far-away voice:
"Certainly ... certainly ... certainly."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account