Books and reading; Children's literature -- Bibliography
There are many editions of the more familiar essays of Macaulay,
especially those that have formed a part of school and college reading
courses. The essay on Milton, unfortunately prescribed in college
preparatory work, is one of the poorest. Those on Clive and Hastings,
also often prescribed, are among the best. It is the prevailing fashion
to underrate Macaulay as a critic, as it was perhaps in his lifetime
the fashion to overrate him. He is lastingly powerful and invigorating,
a great essayist, if only because he knows so well what he wishes to
say and knows precisely how to say it. He is not subtle, not poetic,
but his clear large intellect is still a bright light through the
many-hued mists of Victorian criticism.
JOHN MILTON (1608-74). _Areopagitica, etc._
Milton’s prose is difficult to read and only a little of it is worth
reading except by the student of Milton and the student of history.
The noblest passages of Milton’s prose have been collected in a single
volume, edited by Ernest Myers, and published by Kegan Paul, Trench &
Co.
JOHN MUIR. _The Mountains of California._ _Our National Parks._
JOHN HENRY NEWMAN (1801-90). _Idea of a University._ _Apologia pro
Vita Sua._
An admirable volume of selections, edited by Lewis E. Gates, is
published by Henry Holt & Co. Newman’s “Apologia” belongs properly in
our list of Biography, but it is really an essay in defense of certain
of his ideas. Owing to the fact that Newman’s work is largely religious
controversy and discourse directed to practical rather than artistic
ends, his literary power and the beauty of his prose have not won him
so many readers as he deserves.
BLAISE PASCAL (1623-62). _Provincial Letters._
In the English translation of Thomas M’Crie.
WALTER HORATIO PATER (1839-94). _The Renaissance._ _Appreciations._
The finest English critic of his generation. Contrary to a current
impression that Pater is for the “ultra-literary,” most of his work is
clear and simple; the essays on Wordsworth and Coleridge are the best
to which a reader of those poets can turn.
JOHN RUSKIN (1819-1900). _Sesame and Lilies._ _Crown of Wild Olive._
_Queen of the Air._ _Frondes Agrestes._
There are fourteen volumes of Ruskin in _Everyman’s Library_. “Sesame
and Lilies” and “Frondes Agrestes” (selected passages from “Modern
Painters”) have been often reprinted. The best of Ruskin’s prose is
very beautiful, the worst is tediously prolix. He regretted that his
eloquence took attention from his subject matter, but like Carlyle,
he lives by his eloquence and poetry rather than by his opinions and
teachings.
SYDNEY SMITH (1771-1845). _The Peter Plymley Letters._ _Essays._
In one volume, published by Ward, Lock & Co. After Swift, perhaps the
wittiest English essayist who used his keen weapons in the interests of
justice.
RICHARD STEELE (1671-1729). _Essays_ from the _Tatler_ and the
_Spectator_.
Steele is usually found with Addison in selections from the _Spectator_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account