As for such disputers as my antagonist Mr. Johnson, who insisteth on that of Tit. iii. 10, "A man that is an heretic--is condemned of himself;" when he hath proved that the word heretic hath but one signification, I will say as he doth. Till then, if he will try who shall be damned by bare equivocal words, without the definition, let him take his course, for I will be none of his imitators. [237] Vid. Hun. Eccl. Rom. non est christiana: et Perkins. A papist cannot go beyond a reprobate. Quest. VI. _Whether those that are in the church of Rome, are bound to separate from it? And whether it be lawful to go to their mass or other worship?_ These two also for brevity I join together. I. To the first, we must distinguish of separation: 1. It is one thing to judge that evil which is evil, and separate from it in judgment. 2. It is another thing to express this by forbearing to subscribe, swear, or otherwise approve that evil. 3. And another thing to forbear communion with them in the mass and image worship, and gross or known sins. 4. And another thing to forbear all communion with them, even as to baptism and other lawful things. 5. And another thing to use some open detestations or protestations against them. 2. And we must distinguish much of persons, whether they be ministers or people, free or bound, as wives, children, &c. And now I answer, 1. There is no question but it is a duty to judge all that evil which is evil among the papists or any other. 2. It is the duty of all to forbear subscribing, swearing to, or otherwise approving evil. 3. It is the duty of all mass priests to renounce that part of their calling, and not to administer their mass, or any other unlawful thing. 4. It is the duty of all private christians to forbear communion in the mass, because it is a kind of idolatry, while they worship apiece of bread as God; as also image worship, and all other parts of their religion, in which they are put upon sin themselves, or that which is notorious scandal and symbolizing with them in their bread worship, or rather corruptions of the substance of God's ordinances. 5. It is their duty who have fit opportunity, (when it is like to do more good than harm,) to protest against the papal corruptions where they are, and to declare their detestation of them. 6. It is the duty of those that have children to be baptized or catechised, to make use of more lawful and sound ministers, when they may be had, rather than of a papist priest.