A cityless and countryless world : $b An outline of practical cooperative individualismOlerich, Henry
Science
A cityless and countryless world : $b An outline of practical cooperative individualism
Olerich, Henry
Cooperation; Social problems -- Miscellanea
“Land is not produced by labor, and, therefore, we do not consider
land wealth like you do. Of course the improvement made on land is
wealth and belongs exclusively to the producers. We recognize the right
of owning land only by _occupancy_ and _use_, not by deed, or paper
title, as you pretend to own it. _Vacant land_ is as free with us as
air and sea, because there is much more highly productive land now,
and probably ever will be, than the human inhabitants of _any_ planet
can utilize. At least, I believe, no one can produce trustworthy
evidence to the contrary. By vacant land I mean all that land which is
not worked at all, and all that which, under monopoly, is worked for a
landlord, by renters or by wage-workers. For example: A vacant farm or
town-lot, a rented farm or town-lot, and a farm or town-lot worked for
a land-owner by wage-workers under monopolistic laws like the laws of
owning land by deed or paper title. In short, by ‘vacant land,’ I mean
all unoccupied land, and all land that would not be utilized by the
present owners if all monopolistic land privileges were removed.
“Our communities consist of about 120 families, or 120,000 persons
each, and contain about 144 square miles of land, populated nearly
twice as densely as Belgium, the secret of which I have already told
you. Yet there is plenty of highly productive land left unoccupied for
additional communities or individuals, should they ever desire it. We
never entertain any fear of over-population. It is highly probable that
a highly-intelligent, well-adjusted human society will never be pressed
with over-population, as we shall consider more fully under the head of
sex relations.”
“But did the Marsians always own land only by occupancy and use like
you now do?” asked Mrs. Uwins.
“Oh, no; our ancestors owned it by deed like you own it now. But in
time, the most thoughtful men and women began to feel that it is wrong
to own and control the whole or a portion of the earth’s surface by
virtue of a deed, or paper title. They reasoned something like this: If
a person has a just right to own, by deed, forty acres of the earth’s
surface and all what is beneath that surface to the center of the
earth, for that is the depth a farm is claimed to extend downward,
then he has an equal, just right to own, in a similar manner, any
amount of it.”
“Upon what principle, Mr. Midith, do you claim that it is more wrong to
own land by _deed_ than to own it by _occupancy_ and _use_?” asked Rev.
Dudley.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account