A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of TeachingMcNair, George Hastings
Philosophy
A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of Teaching
McNair, George Hastings
Logic
(7) Since the minor premise cannot be negative, it must be affirmative.
_Problem: To prove that the major premise must be universal._
_Data_: Given the form of the first figure:
M ― G
S ― M
―――――
S ― G
_Proof_: (1) The predicate of the minor premise, M, which is the middle
term, is undistributed; because no affirmative proposition distributes
its predicate.
(2) The middle term must be distributed in the major premise; since in
any syllogism the middle term must be distributed at least once.
(3) As the middle term, M, used as the subject of the major premise,
must be distributed, then the major premise must be universal; because
only universals distribute their subjects.
_Epitome._
_In the first figure, the minor premise must be affirmative, since
making it negative necessitates making the major premise negative also;
the major premise must be universal in order to distribute the middle
term at least once._
_Special canons of the second figure._
(1) One premise must be negative.
(2) The major premise must be universal.
_Problem: To prove that one premise must be negative._
_Data_: Given the form of the second figure:
G ― M
S ― M
―――――
S ― G
_Proof_: (1) The middle term, M, is the predicate of both premises.
(2) The middle term must be distributed at least once, according to
rule 3.
(3) Hence one premise must be negative; since only negatives distribute
their predicates.
_Problem: To prove that the major premise must be universal._
_Data_: Given the form of the second figure:
G ― M
S ― M
―――――
S ― G
_Proof_: (1) As one premise must be negative, it follows that the
conclusion must be negative according to rule 6.
(2) If the conclusion is negative, then its predicate, G, the major
term, must be distributed; since all negatives distribute their
predicates.
(3) When distributed in the conclusion, the major term, G, must also be
distributed in the major premise, where it is used as the subject. See
rule 4.
(4) Hence the major premise must be universal; for only universals
distribute their subjects.
_Epitome._
_In the second figure one premise must be negative in order to
distribute the middle term at least once; and the major premise must be
universal that the major term, which is distributed in the conclusion,
may be distributed in the premise where it occurs._
_Canons of the third figure._
(1) The minor premise must be affirmative.
(2) The conclusion must be particular.
_Problem: To prove that the minor premise must be affirmative._
_Data_: Given the form of the third figure, which is,
M ― G
M ― S
―――――
S ― G
_Proof_: (1) Suppose the minor premise were negative, then the
conclusion would have to be negative, and this would distribute the
predicate G.
(2) A distributed predicate would necessitate its being distributed in
the major premise.
(3) But G, being the conclusion of the major premise, could be
distributed only by a negative proposition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account