A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of TeachingMcNair, George Hastings
Philosophy
A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of Teaching
McNair, George Hastings
Logic
_An epicheirema is a syllogism in which one or both of the premises is
an enthymeme._ To put it in another way: An epicheirema is a syllogism
in which one or both of the premises is supported by a reason.
When one premise is an enthymeme the syllogism is termed a _single_
epicheirema; whereas when both premises are enthymemes it becomes a
_double_ epicheirema.
_Single epicheirema._
All men are mortal, _because all men die_,
Socrates was a man,
∴ Socrates was mortal.
_Double epicheirema._
All men are mortal, _because all men die_,
Socrates was a man, _because he was a rational animal_,
∴ Socrates was mortal.
It is obvious that supporting each premise with a reason lends strength
to the argument. This justifies the use of the epicheirema.
=3. POLYSYLLOGISM.=
_A polysyllogism is a series of syllogisms in which the conclusion of
a preceding syllogism becomes a premise of a succeeding one._
The syllogism in the series whose conclusion becomes a premise of the
succeeding syllogism is termed a _prosyllogism_; while the syllogism
which uses as one of its premises the conclusion of the preceding
syllogism is called an _episyllogism_.
_Illustrations._
{ A quadruped is an animal, }
{ A dog is a quadruped, } _Prosyllogism_
_Polysyllogism_ {∴ A dog is an animal. } }
{ Fido is a dog, } _Episyllogism_
{∴ Fido is an animal. }
{ All who libel an associate }
{ are unprofessional, }
{ This teacher has libelled } _Prosyllogism_
{ her associate, }
_Polysyllogism_ {∴ This teacher is } }
{ unprofessional. } }
{ All who are unprofessional } _Episyllogism_
{ should be disciplined, }
{∴ This teacher should be }
{ disciplined. }
=4. SORITES.=
_A sorites is a series of syllogisms in which all of the conclusions
are omitted except the last one._
Just as the epicheirema is a combination of enthymemes of the _first_
and _second orders_, so the sorites is a combination of enthymemes of
the _third order_. If each conclusion were written, the sorites would
take the form of prosyllogisms and episyllogisms. Two forms of the
sorites are recognized by logicians. These are the _progressive_ or
Aristotelian, and the _regressive_ or Goclenian.
_Illustrations._
_Progressive_
_Symbolized._ _Put in Word Form._
All A is B Thomas Arnold was a teacher,
All B is C A teacher is a man,
All C is D A man is a biped,
All D is E A biped is an animal,
Hence all A is E Hence Thomas Arnold was an animal.
_Regressive_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account