A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of TeachingMcNair, George Hastings
Philosophy
A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of Teaching
McNair, George Hastings
Logic
(2) Of the second group of instances:
(1) The phenomenon must never occur,
(2) One antecedent must be variable,
(3) The other antecedents must be more or less invariable.
Briefly, the one principle concerned is this: There must be an
invariable conjunction between the phenomenon involved and the
antecedent suspected of being the cause.
(5) Advantages and Disadvantages of the Joint Method.
Since the Joint Method permits a consideration of the negative aspect
of the question as well as the affirmative, the opportunities for
testing the many instances concerned are doubled. In consequence, the
conclusions of the Joint Method are more positive than those of the
other methods. It follows that this same opportunity to multiply the
instances would tend to lessen the other objections raised against the
Method of Agreement; viz., plurality of causes, immaterial antecedents,
complexity of phenomenon.
The student must regard the given illustrative symbolizations and
concrete examples as being of the simplest form; in life such are the
exceptions rather than the rule. When investigating questions, like
the cause of the high cost of living, the effect of high tariff, the
reason for the typhoid epidemic, etc., there is often a confusion of
circumstances which makes the Joint Method unsatisfactory, even though
it furnishes a larger opportunity for the multiplication of instances.
The strongest case which the Joint Method is able to present is when
the negative instances repeat the positive in every detail, with the
one exception of the variable antecedent. To wit:
_Strong Argument_:
_Circumstances_ _Phenomenon_
A B C P₁
A L M P₂
‒ L M ―
‒ B C ―
_Weak Argument_:
A B C P₁
A L M P₂
‒ R S ―
‒ T K ―
Despite the disadvantages, the conditions of the Joint Method are more
or less ideal; since the positive branch of the argument _suggests_
the hypothesis, while the negative branch _proves_ the accuracy or
inaccuracy of such.
=5. METHOD OF CONCOMITANT VARIATIONS.=
(1) Principle stated.
Mill’s statement is this: “Whatever phenomenon varies in any manner
whenever another phenomenon varies in a particular manner, is either a
cause or an effect of that phenomenon, or is connected with it through
some fact of causation.”
To put it differently: _If when one phenomenon varies alone, another
also varies alone, the one is either the cause or the effect of the
other._
(2) Concomitant Variations symbolized.
Circumstances Phenomenon
A P
A + a P + p
(A + a) − a (P + p) − p
It is evident from this that little “a” is the cause or the effect of
little “p.” To put it in concrete form:
Let A = X number of calories of heat,
And P = 68° F., the original temperature of room,
And a = candle burning in room for ½ hour,
And p = 2° F.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account