A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of TeachingMcNair, George Hastings
Philosophy
A Class Room Logic: Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of Teaching
McNair, George Hastings
Logic
The whole of opposition is comprehended in _two facts_ which are based
upon _one principle_. This is the principle: _Whatever may be said of
the entire class may be said of a part of that class._ To put it in
another way: Whatever is affirmed of all may be affirmed of some, or,
Whatever is denied of all may be denied of some. To illustrate:
Accepted truth: All planets rotate. (A)
Accepted inference: Some planets rotate. (I)
or
Accepted truth: No planet is a sun. (E)
Accepted inference: Some planets are not suns. (O)
These are the two facts: First, _a particular affirmative may be
derived from a universal affirmative_. Second, _a particular negative
may be derived from a universal negative_. Or, more briefly: _An I may
be derived from an A, and an O from an E_.
SQUARE OF OPPOSITION.
Illustration: ( ‡ Square of Opposition)
Aristotle represented the relations of the four logical propositions by
what is termed the _square of opposition_. Viewed from the standpoint
of the square, the relations may be summed up as follows:
1. _Contrary Propositions._
_Why so named._
As related to each other, A and E are said to be contrary because they
seem to express _contrariety_ to the greatest degree.
_Relation stated._
If one is true, the other must be false, but both may be false.
_Illustrations._
(1) If one is true, the other must be false; e. g., if A is true, as
“All metals are elements,” then E is false, as “No metals are elements.”
Or, if E is true, as “No birds are quadrupeds,” then A is false, as
“All birds are quadrupeds.”
(2) Both may be false. If A is false, as “All men are wise,” then E may
be false, as “No men are wise.”
2. _Subcontrary Propositions._
_Why so named._
Propositions I and O are said to be related to each other in a
subcontrary manner because they are contrary as to each other and
“_under_” their universals A and E.
_Relation stated._
If one is false, the other must be true, or, both may be true.
_Illustrations._
(1) If one is false, the other must be true.
If I is false, as “Some metals are compounds,” then, O is true, as
“Some metals (at least) are not compounds.” Or, if O is false, as “Some
metals are not elements,” then I is true, as “Some metals are elements.”
(2) Both may be true.
If I is true, as “Some men are wise,” then O also may be true, as “Some
men are not wise.”
3. _Subalterns._
_Why so named._
Etymologically considered subaltern means _under the one_, thus
proposition I is under A, and O is under E.
_Relation stated._
_First Relation._
Subalterns are related to each other as are the universals and
particulars; hence,
(1) If the universal is true, the particular under it is also true;
while if the particular is true, the corresponding universal may, or,
may not, be true.
_Illustrations._
(a) If the universal is true, the particular under it is true.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account